Back

Change in Acetylcholinesterase Activity from Childhood to Young Adulthood

Suarez-Lopez, J. R.; Gould, C. F.; Vashishtha, D.; Bradman, A.; Suarez-Torres, J.; Lopez-Paredes, D.; Martinez, D.; Moore, R.

2024-10-22 pediatrics
10.1101/2024.10.21.24315881 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveAcetylcholinesterase (AChE) is an enzyme that metabolizes acetylcholine, an essential neurotransmitter, and is frequently used to monitor adult agricultural workers for exposure to cholinesterase inhibitor pesticides. Yet, there are no clear standards for AChE activity in children and adolescents, which prohibits evaluations of dangerous pesticide exposures in younger populations. MethodsWe measured AChE activity from a single finger stick blood sample data from 746 participants ages 4 to 26 years across 3,100 observations who resided in an agricultural county in Ecuador. We used generalized estimating equations to predict AChE activity levels in one year age increments from 5 to 25 years, accounting for nonlinear aging patterns and survey wave specific effects. We also decomposed variation in observed AChE activity levels into aging effects, differences in our recruited participants, and participant-specific aging patterns. ResultsAverage AChE activity levels across all observations were 3.88 U/mL (standard deviation [sd] = 0.67). AChE activity levels increased nonlinearly as participants aged. We found that males had higher AChE activity levels than females and that those levels established themselves later in age than females. AChE activity levels increased essentially linearly from ages 5 to 12 or 18 years, depending on sex, at which point levels did not meaningfully change with age. Most variation observed in AChE activity levels were due to aging effects. ConclusionOur findings provide reference levels for AChE activity across childhood, adolescence, and into early adulthood that can be used by clinicians and researchers in the context of assessing neurodevelopment and potential exposure to neurotoxicants.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.