Economic Gains from Health Equity: A Model for Pregnancy and Childbirth Policy Decisions
Evans, M. I.; Ryan, G. F.; Devoe, L. D.; Mussalli, G. M.; Britt, D. W.; Worth, J. M.; Mondestin-Sorrentino, M.; Macedonia, C. R.
Show abstract
ImportanceAmerican maternal and neonatal mortality rates are the worst of the worlds high-income countries. These rates are particularly low among patients of color, who have higher Cesarean delivery rates (CDR), higher healthcare costs, and poorer outcomes than White patients. However, common economic analyses do not address interlinked issues and therefore underestimate both the hidden causes of health inequities and the resultant costs to taxpayers. We have therefore designed a more comprehensive health economic model and metric (DEVELOP) that incorporates population health, equity, and economic integration. Design & MeasuresThe DEVELOP model, a childbirth-specific model of the societal economic gain or loss related to healthcare outcomes, incorporates an individuals long-term economic contributions into its calculations of economic benefits. We first used our model to estimate fiscal outcomes if each states CDR for Black patients was lowered to that of White patients. Second, we calculated the costs of "excess" CDR and mortalities among Black patients. Third, we incorporated the additional long-term economic contributions of mothers and their children. ResultsIn the U.S., maternal and neonatal mortality rates and associated costs were higher for Black patients than White patients, and states with the lowest per capita health expenditures showed worse maternal outcomes and higher continuing costs. If the Black patient CDR were reduced to the White patient CDR, taxpayer-funded healthcare programs would save $263 million annually. Reducing the Black patient MMR would improve economic output by $224 million per year, and reducing the Black patient NMR would save $3.1 billion per year, for a combined economic improvement of $3.3 billion annually. Conclusions and RelevanceThe costs of improved prenatal care should be reconceptualized as investments for future economic growth rather than as short-term burdens. Policies blocking reasonable investments in health equity are counterproductive.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term Public Healthcare Burden Associated with Intimate Partner Violence among Canadian Women: A Cohort Study 92%
- The Amortization of Funding Gene Therapies: Making the “Intangibles” Tangible for Patients 92%
- Progressivity of out-of-pocket costs under Australia’s universal health care system: a national linked data study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reflex single-gene non-invasive prenatal testing significantly increases the cost-effectiveness of carrier screening 92%
- Comparison of healthcare resource use and cost between influenza and COVID-19 vaccine coadministration and influenza vaccination only 92%
- Clinical and economic evaluation of a proteomic biomarker preterm birth risk predictor: Cost-effectiveness modeling of prenatal interventions applied to predicted higher-risk pregnancies within a large and diverse cohort 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hospital segregation, critical care strain, and inpatient mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City 92%
- Covid-19 and Excess Mortality in Medicare Beneficiaries 92%
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.