Associations between Psychological Factors and Long-Term Dizziness Handicap in Vestibular Schwannoma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Rutenkröger, M.; Scheer, M.; Rampp, S.; Strauss, C.; Schönfeld, R.; Leplow, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundVestibular schwannoma (VS) often results in persistent dizziness that negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). While physical effects are well-documented, the influence of psychological factors on dizziness severity is less studied. This study investigates how psychological characteristics affect dizziness in VS patients. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 93 VS patients were analyzed, with 77 (82.8%) reporting postoperative dizziness. Psychological factors, including premorbid disorders, personality traits, somatization, and current depression and anxiety levels, were assessed using self-report questionnaires. Correlations between these factors and dizziness severity, measured by the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), were examined. ResultsPatients with postoperative dizziness had higher depression levels and a greater prevalence of preoperative dizziness compared to those without postoperative dizziness. Significant correlations were found between dizziness severity and psychological factors: conscientiousness (r = .30, p = .03), social support (r = .32, p = .03), and the HADS total score (r = .36, p = .01). Emotional aspects of dizziness (DHI-E) were correlated with somatization (r = .27, p = .04) and anxiety (r = .40, p = .01). Functional aspects (DHI-F) were linked to conscientiousness (r = .31, p = .03) and depression (r = .26, p = .06). ConclusionPsychological factors significantly impact dizziness severity in VS patients. Incorporating psychological assessments and interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy and combined vestibular and psychological rehabilitation, may improve treatment outcomes and QoL. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of these approaches and their impact on the relationship between psychological factors and dizziness.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Olfactory Training Efficiency In Post-COVID-19 Persistent Olfactory Disorders 93%
- A systematic review of persistent symptoms and residual abnormal functioning following acute COVID-19: Ongoing symptomatic phase vs. post-COVID-19 syndrome 93%
- Changes in back pain scores after bariatric surgery in obese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cognitive Costs and Gait Parameters During Single- and Dual-Task Conditions: A Comparative Study in Individuals With and Without Non-Specific Neck Pain 93%
- Pain Expectations, Experiences and Coping Strategies Used By Post-operative Patients: A Descriptive Phenomelogical Study 93%
- A case-control study evaluating CT signs of xiphoid process associated with xiphodynia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of Periodic Health Examination Uptake: Insights from a Jordanian Cross-Sectional Study 89%
- Impact on Mental Health of students due to restriction caused by COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study 89%
- Caregivers’ Perspective: Satisfaction With Healthcare Services At The Paediatric Specialist Clinic Of The National Referral Centre In Malaysia 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Thyroid dysfunction diagnosis from routine laboratory tests based on machine learning 90%
- The antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 increases over 5 months in patients with anosmia/dysgeusia 88%
- Metabolic Hormone and Adipokine Alterations in Major Depressive Disorder in Relation to the Acute-Phase Inflammatory Response and Early-Life Adversity 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.