Application of decision-analytic models to inform integrated care interventions for cardiometabolic multimorbidity: A systematic review
Wambiya, E. O. A.; Gillespie, D.; Akparibo, R.; Oguta, J. O.; Odhiambo, C. A.; Otieno, P.; Dodd, P. J.
Show abstract
IntroductionIntegrated care is increasingly being adopted to address the complex needs of patients with cardiometabolic multimorbidity. However, it is unclear how to cost-effectively configure health service pathways for these patients. This study aimed to review and appraise decision analytic models (DAMs) used in economic evaluations of integrated care interventions for patients with cardiometabolic multimorbidity. MethodsWe conducted a systematic search for peer-reviewed articles in eight electronic databases, published in English language until December 2023. Any study worldwide that used a decision-analytic model to conduct an economic evaluation of an integrated care model for patients with cardiometabolic multimorbidity was included. We summarised characteristics of the DAMs, integrated care models evaluated, diseases constituting multimorbidity, and critically appraised the quality of reporting of the economic evaluations using Philips (2006) checklist. ResultsOut of 16 model-based assessments of the differences between alternative integrated care pathways, most studies (n=13, 81%) were cost utility analyses, focused on care for patients with hypertension and/or diabetes concordant multimorbidity (n=11, 69%). Most studies were conducted in high-income countries (n = 11, 69%). More than half (n = 10, 63%) of the studies used simulated Markov models, while only three studies used individual sampling (microsimulation) models. Few studies were explicit about their data validation approaches against local data, quality of data incorporated in the models, and internal and external consistency. ConclusionDecision-analytic models investigating integrated care pathways for cardiometabolic multimorbidity should employ microsimulation to describe and incorporate repeated patient interactions with health care and multimorbidity outcomes in the economic evaluations. Consideration of uncertainty in data sources and model structure is also needed to provide robust conclusions. The study also highlighted the need for more economic evaluations using DAMs in low- and middle-income countries to evaluate integrated care models in the context of cardiometabolic multimorbidity.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 93%
- Evidence of integrated health service delivery during COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a scoping review 93%
- ‘Self-Management Intervention through Lifestyle Education for Kidney health’ (the SMILE-K study): protocol for a single-blind longitudinal randomised control trial with nested pilot study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of health systems interventions in primary health settings on type 2 diabetes care and health outcomes among adults in West Africa: a systematic review protocol 94%
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 93%
- Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnicity and clinical outcomes in COVID-19A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 90%
- COVID-19 among migrants, refugees, and internally displaced persons: systematic review, meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis of the global empirical literature 90%
- Which children and young people are at higher risk of severe disease and death after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- WICID framework Version 1.0: Criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19 92%
- Designathons in Health Research: A Global Systematic Review 92%
- State of the evidence: a survey of global disparities in clinical trials 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.