The Role of ISG15 in Cancer Biology: Systematic Evaluation of ISG15 Expression and Its Molecular Interactions in a Pan-Cancer Context
Chatterjee, S.; Mahata, J.
Show abstract
ISG15s dual role in cancer biology still remains unclear. One major area requiring further investigation is the molecular mechanisms underlying ISG15s pro- and anti-tumorigenic roles in different cancer types. In this study, we try to find the probable pathways that could be influenced by ISG15 in different cancers. ISG15, a ubiquitin-like protein is essential in the post-translational modification ISGylation, which involves a series of E1, E2, and E3 enzymes. During viral infections, ISG15 stimulates Type I interferon production and affects key proteins such as STAT1, JAK-1, MDA-5, Mx1, and RIG-1, thus impacting both host immunity and viral evasion strategies. Furthermore, ISG15 exhibits a complex role in cancer, acting as either a tumor suppressor or an oncogene depending on its state--free or conjugated. Intracellular free ISG15 affects protein stability, while extracellular ISG15 has immunomodulatory effects. Despite its significant role in immune regulation and cancer biology, the exact mechanisms through which ISG15 influences cancer progression remain to be fully elucidated. In this study, we examined ISG15s role in tumor development and progression across 22 cancer types by integrating data from high-throughput databases including TCGA, GTEx, and CPTAC. We evaluated ISG15 expression at both mRNA and protein levels, noting increased mRNA expression in all cancer types except Kidney Chromophobe (KICH) and elevated protein levels in nine out of ten analyzed cancer types, with the exception of liver carcinoma. Analysis of TP53 mutations showed reduced ISG15 mRNA levels in KICH regardless of mutation status. Correlation analyses identified seven highly correlated genes--IFI35, IFI44, OASL, MX1, RSAD2, OAS2, and IRF7 involved in ISG15 downstream signaling. Protein-protein interaction networks revealed hub genes including STAT1, IFIT1, IFIT2, and OASL, which are crucial in cancer pathogenesis and warrant in-depth studies for therapeutic targets and drug repurposing.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Glyoxalase 1: emerging biomarker and therapeutic target in cervical cancer progression 96%
- Identification of cuproptosis and ferroptosis-related subtypes and development of a prognostic signature in colon cancer 95%
- Classification of early and late stage Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma patients from their genomics and epigenomics profiles. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systems biomedicine of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer reveals potential therapeutic targets 98%
- Patient stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using the global transcription factor activity landscape derived from RNA-seq data 97%
- BNIP3 upregulation characterizes cancer cell subpopulation with increased fitness and proliferation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of CHGA protein as a potential biomarker for colon cancer diagnosis: a study on biomarker discovery by machine learning and confirmation by immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer tissue microarrays 96%
- COL7A1 expression improves prognosis prediction for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma atop of stage 96%
- A novel molecular analysis approach in colorectal cancer suggests new treatment opportunities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene expression profiles and pathway enrichment analysis to identification of differentially expressed gene and signaling pathways in epithelial ovarian cancer based on high-throughput RNA-seq data 95%
- Development and validation of a six-RNA binding proteins prognostic signature and candidate drugs for prostate cancer 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome analysis and molecular cataloguing of immunodominant epitopes for multi-epitope based vaccine design 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.