Incidence and prevalence of euthanasia in Belgium. A study using administrative data on all cases of euthanasia reported between 2002 and 2023.
Wels, J.; Hamarat, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundReported assisted dying cases have increased in countries with such legislation. In Belgium, where euthanasia was legalized in 2002, cases rose from 236 in 2003 to 3,423 in 2023. While most studies focus on occurrence rates, this study examines the magnitude of increase and the contribution of demographic changes observed over the period. MethodsWe analysed complete data from the Belgian Federal Commission for the Control and Evaluation of Euthanasia (FCCEE) from 2002-2023 (N=33,604). Using Poisson regression, we calculated Rate Ratios (RR) by age, gender, region, and euthanasia characteristics. We compared estimates with a model that included demographic offsets to calculate Prevalence Rates (PR) and explored interaction effects across sub-categories. ResultsThe yearly RR is 1.070, while the PR is 1.054, indicating that demographic changes significantly influence the observed increase. The PR for euthanasia among females has slightly risen (PR: 1.034), while psychiatric cases remained a small proportion (PR: 1.002). Cases citing multimorbidity have increased (RR: 1.029), whereas cases related to psychiatric disorders (PR: 0.949) and deaths in care homes (PR: 0.998) have not shown significant increases. Higher prevalence is observed in the Flemish region (PR: 1.983) but the gap has narrowed over the years. InterpretationA substantial part of the increase in euthanasia cases is attributed to demographic changes, particularly population ageing. Early increases were mainly due to the regulatory onset, while recent trends reflect a growing influence of demographic factors and regional adjustments. Considering demographic shifts is essential and long-term trends should be monitored. FundingERC (UHealth), FNRS-CQ
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Place, cause and expectedness of death and relationship to the deceased are associated with poorer experiences of end-of-life care and challenges in early bereavement: Risk factors from an online survey of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Response and role of palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national telephone survey of hospices in Italy 91%
- Defining and measuring unmet palliative care needs among people with life-limiting illness: a scoping review of international evidence 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Opt-out policies capacity to increase organ donors is limited 92%
- Lockdown and non-COVID-19 deaths: Cause-specific mortality during the first wave of the 2020 pandemic in Norway. A population-based register study 92%
- Will the COVID-19 pandemic lead to a tsunami of suicides? A Swedish nationwide analysis of historical and 2020 data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- End-of-life care in hematological malignancies – a nationwide comparative study on the Swedish Register of Palliative Care 92%
- Friends with malefit. The effects of keeping dogs and cats, sustaining animal-related injuries and Toxoplasma infection on health and quality of life 92%
- Pandemic trends in health care use: From the hospital bed to the general practitioner with COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of causes of stillbirth and child deaths as determined by verbal autopsy and minimally invasive tissue sampling 91%
- Epidemiological Patterns of Motorcycle-Related Injuries in Cameroon: A Comparative Analysis of Motorcycle Users and Pedestrians 90%
- Suicide and self-harm in low- and middle- income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and Nature of Sexual Violence in Older Adults in Europe: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Evidence 92%
- Are Geographic Factors Associated With Poorer Outcomes In Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19? 92%
- Have deaths of despair risen during the COVID-19 pandemic? A rapid systematic review 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.