Back

The Role of Predictive Processing and Perceptual Load in Selective Visual Attention: An Examination with Semantically Salient and Less Salient Distractors

Ozsu, A. B.; Urgen, B. A.

2024-10-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.15.618177 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Our attentional resources are allocated to the various aspects of the environment based on the context, and predictive coding has been used as a model to explain the interaction between sensory-based information and top-down expectations in visual attention (Spratling, 2008; Rauss et al., 2011). On the other hand, the saliency of the environmental stimuli is also hypothesized to be capturing the attentional resources of the individuals involuntarily, and thus, it is thought to be playing a crucial role in attentional resource allocation. The current study investigates the role of predictive processing of task difficulty in selective visual attention in the presence of various distractors. Utilizing a letter search task, we provided brief cues about the upcoming tasks difficulty, and participants were asked to detect the target letters. We investigated whether predictive processing about task demands may cause a difference in behavioral measures in the presence of semantically less salient distractors in Experiment 1 (Gabor patches) and semantically more salient distractors in Experiment 2 (faces). Results showed that unmet expectations about the task demands caused longer reaction times in both studies. We observed that all independent variables, which are task difficulty, cue congruency, and distractor presence, affected reaction times in both experiments, but cue congruency interacted with distractor presence only in Experiment 2. Here, we argue that though predictive processing plays a role in attentional resource allocation and, distractors characteristics are also crucial as the saliency level interacts with the cue congruency.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vision Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.6%
2
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
5
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
15
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
21
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
22
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
30
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%