Back

Automated Leg Dystonia Diagnosis in Children with Cerebral Palsy Using Machine Learning

Bajpai, R.; Rust, A.; Lott, E.; Kim, S.; Gandham, S.; Chintalapati, K.; Blackburn, J.; Gelineau-Morel, R.; Kruer, M. C.; Mingbundersuk, D.; O Malley, J.; Tochen, L.; Waugh, J.; Wu, S.; Feyma, T.; Aravamuthan, B. R.

2024-10-17 neurology
10.1101/2024.10.15.24315574 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesLeg dystonia in cerebral palsy (CP) is debilitating but remains underdiagnosed. Routine clinical evaluation has only 12% accuracy for leg dystonia diagnosis compared to gold-standard expert consensus assessment. We determined whether expert-cited leg dystonia features could be quantified to train machine learning (ML) models to detect leg dystonia in videos of children with CP. MethodsEight pediatric movement disorders physicians assessed 298 videos of children with CP performing a seated task at two CP centers. We extracted leg dystonia features cited by these experts during consensus-building discussions, quantified these features in videos, used these quantifications to train 4664 ML models on 163 videos from one center, and tested the best performing models on a separate set of 135 videos from both centers. ResultsWe identified 69 quantifiable features corresponding to 12 expert-cited leg dystonia features. ML models trained using these quantifications achieved 88% sensitivity, 74% specificity, 82% positive predictive value, 84% negative predictive value, and 82% accuracy for identifying leg dystonia across both centers. Of the 25 features contributing to the best performing ML models, 17 (68%) quantified leg movement variability. We used these ML models to develop DxTonia, open-source software that identifies leg dystonia in videos of children with CP. InterpretationDxTonia primarily leverages detection of leg movement variability to achieve 82% accuracy in identifying leg dystonia in children with CP, a significant improvement over routine clinical diagnostic accuracy of 12%. Observing or quantifying leg movement variability during a seated task can facilitate leg dystonia detection in CP.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
3
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%