Back

Serum metabolomics identifies unique inflammatory signatures to distinguish rheumatoid arthritis responders and non-responders to TNF inhibitor therapy

Fresneda Alarcon, M.; Xu, Y.; Lima, C.; Ford, S.; Goodacre, R.; Phelan, M.; Wright, H. L.

2024-10-16 rheumatology
10.1101/2024.10.15.24315530
Show abstract

IntroductionRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an auto-immune disease which causes irreversible damage to tissue and cartilage within synovial joints. Rapid diagnosis and treatment with disease-modifying therapies is essential to reduce inflammation and prevent joint destruction. RA is a heterogeneous disease, and many patients do not respond to front-line therapies, requiring escalation of treatment onto biologics, of which TNF inhibitors (TNF-i) are the most common. Objectives/MethodsIn this study we determined whether serum metabolomics, using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, could discriminate RA blood sera from healthy human controls and whether serum metabolomics could be used to predict response or non-response to TNF inhibitor (TNF-i) therapy. ResultsNMR spectroscopy identified 35 metabolites in RA sera, with acetic acid being significantly lower in RA sera compared to healthy controls (HC, FDR<0.05). PLS-DA modelling identified 2-hydroxyisovalericacetic acid, acetoacetic acid, mobile lipids, alanine and leucine as important metabolites for discrimination of RA and HC sera by 1H NMR spectroscopy (averaged 83.1% balanced accuracy, VIP score >1). FTIR spectroscopy identified a significant difference between RA and HC sera in the 1000-1200 cm-1 spectral area, representing the mixed region of carbohydrates and nucleic acids (FDR<0.05). Sera from RA patients who responded to TNF-i were significantly different from TNF-i non-responder sera in the 1600-1700 cm-1 region (FDR<0.05). ConclusionWe propose that NMR and FTIR serum metabolomics could be used as a diagnostic tool alongside current clinical parameters to diagnose RA and to predict whether someone with severe RA will respond to TNF-i.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Metabolites
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Arthritis & Rheumatology
based on 21 papers
Top 0.3%
16.7%
3
Rheumatology
based on 21 papers
Top 0.4%
8.2%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 26%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
based on 23 papers
Top 0.5%
4.9%
6
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 0.3%
3.1%
7
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 76%
3.1%
8
RMD Open
based on 11 papers
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 0.7%
2.7%
10
Advanced Science
based on 12 papers
Top 0.3%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 3%
2.5%
12
Clinical Immunology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.5%
2.5%
13
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Genome Biology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 12%
1.4%
17
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 5%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 32%
1.4%
20
The Lancet Rheumatology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Journal of Personalized Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
23
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 5%
0.9%
24
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
25
PLOS Pathogens
based on 35 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
27
mSystems
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
0.7%