Back

Improving Rectal Tumor Segmentation with Anomaly Fusion Derived from Anatomical Inpainting: A Multicenter Study

Cai, L.; Abdelatty, M. A.; Han, L.; Lambregts, D.; van Griethuysen, J.; Pooch, E.; Beets-Tan, R. G. H.; Benson, S.; Brunekreef, J.; Teuwen, J.

2024-10-16 health informatics
10.1101/2024.10.15.24315517 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate rectal tumor segmentation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is paramount for effective treatment planning. It allows for volumetric and other quantitative tumor assessments, potentially aiding in prognostication and treatment response evaluation. Manual delineation of rectal tumors and surrounding structures is time-consuming and typically. Over the past few years, deep learning has shown strong results in automated tumor segmentation in MRI. Current studies on automated rectal tumor segmentation, however, focus solely on tumoral regions without considering the rectal anatomical entities and often lack a solid multicenter external validation. In this study, we improved rectal tumor segmentation by incorporating anomaly maps derived from anatomical inpainting. This inpainting was implemented using a U-Net-based model trained to reconstruct a healthy rectum and mesorectum from prostate T2-weighted images (T2WI). The rectal anomaly maps were generated from the difference between the original rectal and reconstructed pseudo-healthy slices during inference. The derived anomaly maps were used in the downstream tumor segmentation tasks by fusing them as an additional input channel (AAnnUNet). Alternative methods for integrating rectal anatomical knowledge were evaluated as baselines, including Multi-Target nnUNet (MTnnUNet), which added rectum and mesorectum segmentation as auxiliary tasks, and Multi-Channel nnUNet (MCnnUNet), which utilized rectum and mesorectum masks as an additional input channel. As part of this study, we benchmarked nine models for rectal tumor segmentation on a large multicenter dataset of preoperative T2WI as the baseline and nnUNet outperformed the other eight models on the external dataset. The MTnnUNet demonstrated improvements in both supervised and semi-supervised settings (AI-generated rectum and mesoretum were used) compared to nnUNet, while the MCnnUNet showed benefits only in the semi-supervised setting. Importantly, anomaly maps were strongly associated with tumoral regions, and their integration within AAnnUNet led to the best tumor segmentation results across both settings. The effectiveness of AAnnUNet demonstrated the value of the anomaly maps, indicating a promising direction for improving rectal tumor segmentation and model robustness for multicenter data.

Published in Scientific Reports (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.6%
2
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.4%
Scientific Reports · published here
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
4
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
5
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
7
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
8
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
13
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
20
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
29
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
NMR in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%