Enhancing Radiographic Diagnosis: CycleGAN-based methods for reducing cast shadow artifacts in wrist radiographs
Norris, S. A.; Badawy, M. K.; Carrion, D.; Ditchfield, M.; Gubser, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveWe extend existing techniques by using generative adversarial network (GAN) models to reduce the appearance of cast shadows in radiographs across various age groups. Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively collected 12000 adult and pediatric wrist radiographs, evenly divided between those with and without casts. The test subset consisted of 100 radiographs with cast and 100 without cast. We extended the results from a previous study that employed CycleGAN by enhancing the model using a perceptual loss function and a self-attention layer. ResultsThe CycleGAN model which incorporates a self-attention layer and perceptual loss function delivered the best quantitative performance. This model was applied to images from 20 cases where the original reports recommended CT scanning or repeat radiographs without the cast, which were then evaluated by radiologists for qualitative assessment. The results demonstrated that the generated images could improve radiologists diagnostic confidence, in some cases leading to more decisive reports. Where available, the reports from follow-up imaging were compared with those produced by radiologists reading AI-generated images. Every report, except two, provided identical diagnoses as those associated with follow-up imaging. The ability of radiologists to perform robust reporting with downsampled AI-enhanced images is clinically meaningful and warrants further investigation. Additionally, radiologists were unable to distinguish AI-enhanced from unenhanced images. ConclusionThese findings suggest the cast suppression technique could be integrated as a tool to augment clinical workflows, with the potential benefits of reducing patient doses, improving operational efficiencies, reducing delays in diagnoses, and reducing the number of patient visits.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 94%
- Fully automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial CT scans for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning using the nnU-Net framework 94%
- Pairwise learning of MRI scans using a convolutional Siamese network for prediction of knee pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 96%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 94%
- Investigating the relationship between internal spinal alignment and back shape in patients with scoliosis using PCdare: a comparative, reliability and validation study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 94%
- Classification of Hyper-scale Multimodal Imaging Datasets 93%
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Detecting Signs of Tuberculosis on Chest Radiographs among US-bound Immigrants and Refugees 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 94%
- Generating synthetic data in digital pathology through diffusion models: a multifaceted approach to evaluation 94%
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 94%
- Comparing performance of deep convolutional neural network with orthopaedic surgeons on identification of total hip prosthesis design from plain radiographs 93%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.