Back

Lower left ventricular ejection time in MYBPC3 variant carriers with overt or subclinical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Yan, I.; Moehring, Z.; Reichart, D.; Muench, J.; Woitschach, R.; Kirchhof, P.; Carrier, L.; Ho, C. Y.; Eschenhagen, T.; Patten, M.

2024-10-16 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.10.15.24315469 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an inherited cardiomyopathy mainly caused by pathogenic variants in MYBPC3 and MYH7, encoding myosin binding protein C3 and myosin heavy chain 7, respectively. These variants can cause increased actin-myosin crossbridge cycling resulting in ventricular hypercontractility. Little is known about genotype-specific differences. Mice lacking Mybpc3 exhibited reduced left ventricular ejection time (LVET). In this study we tested whether LVET is specifically altered in patients carrying MYBPC3 variants by retrospective echocardiographic analysis in two genotype-defined HCM cohorts. Methods and resultsLVET was measured by echocardiography and adjusted for heart rate (LVET index, LVETI) in 173 patients carrying MYBPC3 or MYH7 pathogenic variant. There was a discovery cohort (Hamburg; 46 MYBPC3, 31 MYH7) and a validation cohort ("Valsartan in Attenuating Disease Evolution in Early Sarcomeric HCM"; 55 MYBPC3, 41 MYH7). Data were compared with 44 healthy controls from Hamburg. Variant carriers were stratified for overt (G+LVH+) or subclinical left ventricular hypertrophy (G+LVH-). LVETI was lower in MYBPC3 and higher in MYH7 G+LVH+ patients than in controls in the discovery, validation and pooled cohorts (pooled: 385 {+/-} 23 ms MYBPC3, 436 {+/-} 38 ms MYH7, 411 {+/-} 15 ms controls). Similar findings were seen in G+LVH-. ConclusionThe data suggest that variants in MYBPC3 and MYH7 result in distinct biophysical consequences, which can be detected by measuring LVETI in patients. The findings may have implications for potential genotype-specific differences in response to therapies targeting sarcomere function.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.0%
3
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.2%
6
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
8
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
9
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
12
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
13
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
14
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
22
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
24
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%