Back

Geometric Deep Learning Methods for Improved Generalizability in Medical Computer Vision: Hyperbolic Convolutional Neural Networks in Multi-Modality Neuroimaging

Ayubcha, C.; Sajed, S.; Omara, C.; Singh, S. B.; Lokesha, Y. U.; Liu, A.; Aziz-Sultan, M. A.; Smith, T. R.; Beam, A.

2024-10-14 health informatics
10.1101/2024.10.12.24315391 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study investigates the potential advantages of hyperbolic convolutional neural networks (HCNNs) over traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in neuroimaging tasks. Materials and MethodsWe conducted a comparative analysis of HCNNs and CNNs across various medical imaging modalities and diseases, with a focus on a compiled multi-modality neuroimaging dataset. The models were assessed for performance parity, robustness to adversarial attacks, semantic organization of embedding spaces, and generalizability. Zero-shot evaluations were also performed with ischemic stroke non-contrast CT images. ResultsHCNNs matched CNN performance on less complex settings and demonstrated superior semantic organization, and robustness to adversarial attacks. While HCNNs equaled CNNs in out-of-sample datasets identifying Alzheimers disease, in zero-shot evaluations, HCNNs outperformed CNNs and radiologists. DiscussionHCNNs deliver enhanced robustness and organization in the neuroimaging data. This likely underlies why while HCNNs perform similarly to CNNs with respect to in-sample tasks, they confer improved generalizability. Nevertheless, HCNNs encounter efficiency and performance challenges with larger, complex datasets. These limitations underline the need for further optimization of HCNN architectures. ConclusionHCNNs present promising improvements in generalizability and resilience for medical imaging applications, particularly in neuroimaging. Despite challenges with larger datasets, HCNNs enhance performance under adversarial conditions and offer better semantic organization, suggesting valuable potential in generalizable deep learning models in medical imaging and neuroimaging diagnostics.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.5%
2
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
5
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.6%
6
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
9
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
NMR in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
21
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
22
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%