Back

FiNNpy 2.0: Fast MEG source reconstruction

Crompton, D.; Keerthi, P.; Milosevic, L.; Scherer, M.

2024-10-14 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.11.617925 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Herein, we present the 2.0 update of FiNNpy, which expands the toolkits initial scope from the analysis of multi-site electrophysiological activity to track information propagation to include source reconstruction capability for MEG signals. Following the toolkits de- sign guidelines, the new functionality has been optimized towards minimal resource consumption, making source reconstruction much faster, especially when executed in a parallelized fashion. Furthermore, several quality-of-life aspects are introduced to support source reconstruction, such as grouping source-space activity into cortical areas, a cohesive documentation & in-code extensive literature references, and wrapping of previously terminal exclusive functions of FreeSurfer.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
○ 903 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Neuroinformatics
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
○ 122 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.0%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
○ 41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Imaging Neuroscience
● 282 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.7%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
Human Brain Mapping
○ 329 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.3%
7
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.1%
8
Aperture Neuro
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
10
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
11
Journal of Neural Engineering
○ 221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
eneuro
● 439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
14
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
○ 96 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
15
Brain Topography
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Brain Informatics
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
18
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
○ 85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
19
Neurophotonics
● 42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
20
Brain Stimulation
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
22
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.