Back

Impact of accurate initial discharge planning and in-patient transfers of care on discharge delays: a retrospective cohort study

Burns, D.; Duckworth, C. J.; Lamas-Fernandez, C.; Leyland, R.; Wright, M.; Stammers, M.; George, M.; Boniface, M.

2024-10-12 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2024.10.11.24315330 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the association between initial discharge planning and transfers of in-patient care with discharge delay. To identify operational changes which could expedite discharge within the Discharge to Assess (D2A) model. DesignRetrospective cohort study. SettingUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHSFT). ParticipantsAll adults ([≥]18 years) who registered a hospital spell in UHSFT between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022 (n = 258,051 spells). Individuals were followed from hospital admission through to discharge. Data includes demographics, comorbidities, operational information (ward changes, handovers) and discharge information (estimated discharge date, D2A pathway). Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was discharge delay, defined as the number of days between the final estimated discharge date and the actual discharge date. Odds ratio analysis was used to assess the impact of initial discharge planning accuracy (D2A pathway), number of ward moves, and number of in-speciality handovers on the outcome, adjusting for demographic and patient complexity factors. ResultsOut of 65,491 spells, 10,619 had an initial planned pathway that did not match the final discharge pathway, with 7,790 of these spells (75.1%) recording a discharge delay. Conversely, 10,216 of 54,872 spells (18.6%) where the initial pathway matched the final pathway recorded a discharge delay (adjusted odds ratio 2.72 (95% CI 2.55 - 2.91)). Ward moves and in-specialty handovers were also associated with increased likelihood of discharge delay, with adjusted odds ratio 1.25 (1.23 - 1.28) per ward move and 1.17 (1.14 - 1.20) per in-specialty handover. ConclusionsThis study finds a strong association between inaccurate initial discharge plans and in-patient transfers of care with discharge delay, after controlling for patient complexity and acuity. This highlights the need to consider how initial plans, and in-patient transfers affect discharge planning. Given the lead-times for organising onward care, operational inefficiencies are most impactful for patients eventually discharged on pathways with higher planning complexity. Key messagesWhat is already known on this topic O_LISeveral factors are known to influence discharge delay including age, whether the spell was elective, and patient complexity. C_LIO_LIDischarge planning has been historically difficult to characterise. C_LI What this study adds O_LIA robust measurement of the accuracy of discharge planning. C_LIO_LIHighlights the importance of considering the impact of initial discharge plans on the planning process. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policy O_LIEncourage a higher level of consideration when suggesting an initial Discharge to Assess pathway to reduce errors in planning down the line. C_LIO_LIEnsure that relevant discharge information is communicated when patients are transferred between wards and care teams. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
28.8%
2
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.8%
4
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.1%
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.8%
7
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
8
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
9
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
10
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
11
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
12
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
22
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
23
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
24
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%