Back

Measles Virus Genotype A in Canada's Capital Region Wastewater Associated with Public Health Vaccination Initiatives

Tomalty, E. N.; Mercier, E.; Pisharody, L.; Nguyen, T.; Tian, X.; Kabir, M. P.; Wong, C.; Addo, F.; Hegazy, N.; Renouf, E.; Wan, S.; Delatolla, R.

2024-10-18 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.10.11.24315327 medRxiv
Show abstract

The recent global resurgence of measles in 2023-2024, despite its preventability through vaccination, is a significant public health concern largely driven by decreased vaccination coverage during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. To address this resurgence and to restore vaccine coverage disrupted by the pandemic, Ottawa Public Health intensified vaccination efforts in 2023 and 2024. Additionally, a research initiative began in April 2024 to monitor Ottawa wastewater for measles virus (MeV) using established wastewater and environmental surveillance (WES) protocols. Given the absence of active measles cases in the Ottawa region, unexpected positive MeV detections through RT-qPCR prompted genotypic analysis as well as retrospective analysis of archived RNA samples dating back to 2020. The genotypic analysis identified positive detection to belong to genotype A, the progenitor strain of the viral vaccines, marking the first report of MeV RNA and MeV vaccine shedding in North American wastewater. Positive detections in both real-time and retrospectively analysed samples coincided with the increased vaccination efforts by Ottawa Public Health. These finding emphasize the importance of integrating genotypic analysis into WES practices to mitigate possible confounding factors, such as vaccine shedding into wastewater. Additionally, this research highlights the potential application of MeV WES for monitoring community immunization efforts in real time. Implementing the findings of this study for MeV WES, as well as for other re-emerging viruses, will enhance the accuracy of public health response and optimize resource allocation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.