Back

Cochlear implants with dexamethasone-eluting electrode arrays reduce foreign body response in a murine model of cochlear implantation and human subjects

Rahman, M. T.; Mostaert, B.; Eckard, P.; Fatima, S. M.; Scheperle, R.; Razu, I.; Hunger, B.; Olszewski, R. T.; Gu, S.; Garcia, C.; Khan, N. A.; Bennion, D. M.; Oleson, J.; Kirk, J. R.; Enke, Y. L.; Gay, R. D.; Morell, R. J.; Hirose, K.; Hoa, M.; Claussen, A. D.; Hansen, M. R.

2024-10-13 otolaryngology
10.1101/2024.10.11.24315311 medRxiv
Show abstract

The inflammatory foreign body response (FBR) following cochlear implantation (CI) can negatively impact CI outcomes, including increased electrode impedances. This study aims to investigate the long-term efficacy of dexamethasone eluting cochlear implant and locally delivered dexamethasone, a potent anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid on the intracochlear FBR and electrical impedance post-implantation in a murine model and human subjects. The left ears of CX3CR1+/GFP Thy1+/YFP (macrophage-neuron dual reporter) mice were implanted with dexamethasone-eluting cochlear implants (Dex-CI) or standard implant (Standard-CI) while the right ear served as unoperated control. Another group of dual reporter mice was implanted with a standard CI electrode array followed by injection of dexamethasone in the middle ear to mimic current clinical practice (Dex-local). Mouse implants were electrically stimulated with serial measurement of electrical impedance. Human subjects were implanted with either standard or Dex-CI followed by serial impedance measurements. Dex-CI reduced electrical impedance in the murine model and human subjects and inflammatory FBR in the murine model for an extended period. Dex-local in the murine model is ineffective for long-term reduction of FBR and electrode impedance. Our data suggest that dexamethasone eluting arrays are more effective than the current clinical practice of locally applied dexamethasone in reducing FBR and electrical impedance.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.