Back

Differences in metagenome coverage may confound abundance-based and diversity conclusions

Riquelme, B. A.; Rodriguez-R, L. M.; Konstantinidis, K. T.

2024-10-11 microbiology
10.1101/2024.10.10.617679 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although the importance of rarefying 16S rRNA gene data to the same coverage for reliable comparisons of diversity between samples has been well appreciated, the impact of (shotgun) metagenome coverage (i.e., what fraction of diversity was sequenced) on biological conclusions is commonly overlooked. We demonstrate that uneven coverage can lead to misleading conclusions about which features (e.g., genes, genomes) may differentiate two metagenomes or their diversity comparisons. We outline an approach to minimize this impact.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
● 394 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
11.7%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
3
ISME Communications
◐ 120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
Similar papers in this journal
4
mBio
● 833 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
The ISME Journal
◐ 228 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
mSphere
● 302 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
Microbiome
○ 154 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Environmental Microbiology
○ 133 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Microbial Genomics
● 225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
● 339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
11
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
12
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
13
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.1%
14
Microbiology Resource Announcements
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
○ 427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
18
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
19
Molecular Ecology Resources
○ 171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Water Research
○ 79 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
Microorganisms
○ 106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.