Back

Deep-sea fish reveal alternative pathway for vertebrate visual development

Fogg, L. G.; Isari, S.; Barnes, J. E.; Patel, J. S.; Marshall, J.; Salzburger, W.; Cortesi, F.; de Busserolles, F.

2024-10-10 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.10.10.617579 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Vertebrate vision is accomplished by two phenotypically distinct types of photoreceptors in the retina: the saturation-resistant cones for the detection of bright light and the highly sensitive rods for dim light conditions [1]. The current dogma is that, during development, all vertebrates initially feature a cone-dominated retina, and rods are added later [2, 3]. By studying the ontogeny of vision in three species of deep-sea fishes, we show that their larvae express cone-specific genes in photoreceptors with rod-like morphologies. Through development, these fishes either retain this rod-like cone retina (Maurolicus mucronatus) or switch to a retina with true rod photoreceptors with expression of rod-specific genes and transcription factors (Vinciguerria mabahiss and Benthosema pterotum). In contrast to the larvae of most marine fishes, which inhabit the bright upper layer of the open ocean, the larvae of deep-sea fishes occur deeper, exposing them to a dimmer light environment [4-7]. Spectral maxima predictions from molecular dynamics simulations and environmental light estimations suggest that using transmuted photoreceptors that combine the characteristics of both cones and rods maximises visual performance in these dimmer light conditions. Our findings provide molecular, morphological, and functional evidence for the evolution of an alternative developmental pathway for vertebrate vision.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.1%
2
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
7
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
8
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
10
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
11
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
12
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
13
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
21
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
23
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Biophysics and Physicobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
29
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%