EXploring the journeys of Patients who End their Calls prior to Triage by NHS111: The EXPECT study
Pilbery, R.; Lewis, J.; Simpson, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe English National Health Service (NHS) 111 telephone service aims to assist members of the public with urgent medical care needs. However, each year nearly 18% of the 20.6 million calls to 111 are abandoned prior to speaking to a health advisor. There are concerns that callers who are not triaged may not appropriately seek the correct level of care for their needs. The aim of this study was to explore the patient journey for callers who contact NHS 111 but end the call prior to speaking to a health advisor. The primary objective was to determine whether callers to NHS 111 who end the call prior to triage attend an ED with a non-avoidable cause sooner than who are triaged by an NHS 111 health advisor. MethodsWe obtained routine data pertaining to all NHS 111 calls made by adult patients registered with a General Practitioner (GP) in the Bradford region of Yorkshire, UK, between the 1st January 2022 and 30th June 2023. Subsequent healthcare access in the 72 hours following each callers first (index) call was identified using the Connected Yorkshire research database. We conducted a time-to-event analysis comparing the two cohorts: those whose index call was triaged by an NHS 111 health advisor vs. callers who ended the index call prior to triage. The event was defined as an Emergency Department (ED) attendance within 72 hours for a non-avoidable cause. We utilised Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves and conducted log-rank tests to compare the time to first non-avoidable ED attendance between cohorts, and a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for baseline characteristics. From this, we calculated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of attending an ED with a non-avoidable cause. ResultsThere were 19,056 index non-triaged and 168,609 triaged calls made to NHS 111 by an adult registered with a Bradford GP. A lower proportion of ED attendances in the non-triaged call cohort were non-avoidable compared with the triaged cohort (80.0% compared to 84.6% for triaged calls). In addition, callers in the non-triaged call cohort attended ED later than the triaged call cohort (median 10 vs 8 hours, p<0.001 by log rank test). The time-to-attend ED aHR for non-triaged calls vs triaged calls was 0.32 (95%CI 0.30-0.34). ConclusionThe time-to-event analysis found that callers to NHS 111 who do not wait to be triaged, are slower to attend ED with a non-avoidable cause than those who are triaged, and are more likely to attend ED with an avoidable cause than triaged callers. This suggests that, for patients with a serious health problem that would be considered non-avoidable at ED, triaging by NHS 111 supports those patients to seek appropriate help more quickly. In turn, patients with such health conditions who end the call before triage may delay seeking appropriate levels of healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High use of the emergency department shows typical features of complex systems: analysis of multicentre linked data 95%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 94%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatio-temporal modelling of referrals to outpatient respiratory clinics in the integrated care system of the Morecambe Bay area, England 93%
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 92%
- Access to personal protective equipment in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: results from a nationwide cohort study (UK-REACH) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 95%
- A comparison of self-triage tools to nurse driven triage in the emergency department 93%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 94%
- Support and follow-up needs of patients discharged from Intensive Care after severe COVID-19: a mixed-methods study of the views of UK general practitioners and intensive care staff during the pandemic’s first wave 93%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient symptoms and experience following COVID-19: results from a UK wide survey 91%
- Post-COVID assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre analysis of symptoms and healthcare needs in 1325 individuals 90%
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients admitted with COVID-19 in East London: a retrospective cohort analysis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.