Back

The association between outdoor ambient temperature and depression and mania: an ecological momentary assessment study

Clery, P.; Hayes, J. F.; Launders, N.; Thompson, R.; Kandola, A.; Osborn, D. J.; Lawrance, E. L.; Jeffery, A.; Dykxhoorn, J.

2024-10-10 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.10.10.24315229 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEnvironmental heat exposure can negatively impact mental health. Evidence for its effect on mood disorder symptoms is inconsistent. Current studies are limited by poor temporal and geographical resolution. MethodsWe used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data from the smartphone app juli to investigate the association between real-time mean and maximum ambient temperature collected from smartphone geolocation, and depressive and manic symptom scales, every two weeks, in adults with depression and bipolar disorder. We used negative binomial mixed-effects regression models, controlled for demographic and weather variables, and stratified by season. ResultsWe analysed data from 4,000 participants with depressive symptom scores and 2,132 with manic symptom scores, between 2021 and 2023. We found that each 1{degrees}C increase in mean daily temperature in the preceding two weeks was associated with a 0.2% reduction in depressive symptom scores (coeff 0.998, 95%CI 0.997-0.999) and a 0.4% increase in manic symptom scores (coeff 1.004, 95%CI 1.001-1.007). Associations between maximum temperature and symptom scores followed a similar pattern. LimitationsWe were unable to capture several socio-demographic covariates, had limited geographical information due to privacy regulations, and included a non-random sample. ConclusionsWe found evidence that higher temperatures were associated with increased manic symptoms and decreased depressive symptoms, indicating an important relationship between temperature and the mood disorder continuum. With global heating, there is a need to understand the impact of temperature on mood symptoms, to provide targeted clinical prevention and support. This study demonstrates potential for EMA methods to inform our understanding of these links.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.