Evaluation of the Impact of a 90-day Mortality Prediction Model Integrated in the EHR for Advanced Care Planning
Rossi, L. A.; Roberts, L.; Olivares, M.; Christian, A.; Mooney, S.; Morse, D.; Zachariah, F.
Show abstract
Medical centers have begun to integrate AI models for mortality prediction in their electronic health records (EHR) systems to support advance care planning.1 There is evidence that advance care planning can reduce suffering and unwanted, costly treatment near the end of life.2 To better target patients at a risk of death with advance directive (AD) capture and goals of care (GOC) conversations at our comprehensive cancer center, we developed and integrated a 90-day mortality prediction model in the EHR. The model has been live since February, 2021. Performance in production has matched very closely pre-production pilots, achieving an 85% AUROC (AI Showcase Stage I). We implemented 4 clinical decision support (CDS) tools driven by the model to promote goal concordant care in inpatient and outpatient encounters (AI Showcase Stage II).3 In this document, we analyze the impact of one of the aforementioned CDS applications, implemented as an inter-ruptive alert for the clinical social workers (CSWs) to facilitate advance directive (AD) completion in the inpatient setting. We also present preliminary results on volumes of GOC conversations prompted by one of the model-driven alerts. Our analysis is based on 12 months of data, collected between March 1, 2021 and February 28, 2022. The challenges for our assessment included inconsistent EHR documentation practices, coexistence with (traditional) non-AI driven processes tasked for similar goals and many external factors that can affect target outcomes. We believe such challenges to be rather common across healthcare organizations integrating AI in their workflows.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Design and implementation of a system for automated monitoring of adherence to evidenced-based clinical guideline recommendations 94%
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 94%
- Distinguishing Admissions Specifically for COVID-19 from Incidental SARS-CoV-2 Admissions: A National Retrospective EHR Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 94%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 94%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential for digital patient symptom recording through symptom assessment applications to optimize patient flow and reduce waiting times in Urgent Care Centers: a simulation study 95%
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 95%
- Is virtual care the new normal? Evidence supporting Covid-19’s durable transformation on healthcare delivery 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 92%
- Development of a data-driven COVID-19 prognostication tool to inform triage and step-down care for hospitalised patients in Hong Kong: A population based cohort study 92%
- Public attitudes towards the use of novel technologies in their future healthcare: A UK survey 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.