Back

Estimation of Direct and Indirect Polygenic Effects and Gene-Environment Interactions using Polygenic Scores in Case-Parent Trio Studies

Wang, Z.; Grosvenor, L.; Ray, D.; Ruczinski, I.; Beaty, T.; Volk, H.; Ladd-Acosta, C.; Chatterjee, N.

2024-10-09 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.10.08.24315066 medRxiv
Show abstract

Family-based studies provide a unique opportunity to characterize genetic risks of diseases in the presence of population structure, assortative mating, and indirect genetic effects. We propose a novel framework, PGS-TRI, for the analysis of polygenic scores (PGS) in case-parent trio studies to estimate the risk of an index condition associated with direct effects of inherited PGS, indirect effects of parental PGS, and gene-environment interactions. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate the robustness of PGS-TRI in the presence of complex population structure and assortative mating. We applied PGS-TRI to multi-ancestry trio studies of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) (Ntrio = 18,383), deriving transmission-based estimates of risk for the direct effects of established PGS for ASD and other neurocognitive traits PGS across different ancestry groups and along a genetic ancestry continuum. Our analysis also identified significant indirect effects from parental PGS for BMI and several neurocognitive traits on childrens ASD risk. We also employed PGS-TRI in a trio study of European and Asian orofacial clefts (OFCs) (Ntrio = 1,904), investigating both direct and indirect effect of an established PGS and its interaction with maternal risk factors. Finally, we applied PGS-TRI to investigate the direct and indirect effects of large-scale transcriptome-wide and metabolome-wide traits on ASD and OFCs risks.

Published in Nature Genetics (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.