Variation in precipitation drives differences in interactions and short-term transient instability between grassland functional groups: a stage-structured community approach
Gupta, A.; Gascoigne, S.; Barabas, G.; Qi, M.; Fenollosa, E.; Thornley, R.; Hernandez, C.; Hector, A.; Salguero-Gomez, R.
Show abstract
Climate change is expected to increase the frequency and severity of precipitation extremes, causing droughts and flooding. Consequently, grassland communities are forecasted to become increasingly unstable. To predict grassland responses, we need empirical information together with models that reliably extrapolate community dynamics from those observations. However, such prediction is challenging because community models typically simulate long-term (asymptotic) performance, and thus potentially neglect their short-term (transient) performance. Here, we use data from a precipitation experiment performed over eight years to model both short- and long-term responses of three functional groups - grasses, legumes, and non-leguminous forbs - to precipitation extremes. We use multi-functional-group Integral Projection Models and pseudospectral theory, to track grassland community dynamics. We show that the percentage-cover-stage-structure of functional groups shapes their transient instability, and that inter-functional-group interactions are competitive under increased precipitation but facilitative under decreased precipitation. IPMs and pseudospectra enable forecasting of how functional-group-stage-structure drives responses to climatic extremes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural asymmetry in biotic interactions as a tool to understand and predict ecological persistence 97%
- Understanding the emergence of contingent and deterministic exclusion in multispecies communities 97%
- Predictions of biodiversity are improved by integrating trait-based competition with abiotic filtering 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.