Environmental and anthropic factors influencing Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), with emphasis on natural infection and dissemination: Implications for an emerging vector in Colombia.
Mantilla, J. S.; Montilla-Lopez, K.; Sarmiento-Senior, D.; Chapal-Arcos, E.; Velandia-Romero, M. L.; Calvo, E.; Morales, C. A.; Castellanos, J. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundViruses such as dengue virus (DENV), Zika virus (ZIKV), and chikungunya virus (CHIKV) pose major threats to human health, causing endemic, emerging, and reemerging diseases. These arboviruses have complex life cycles involving Aedes mosquitoes, driven by environmental, ecological, socioeconomic, and cultural factors. In Colombia, Aedes aegypti is the primary vector, but Aedes albopictus is expanding across the country. Understanding the unique characteristics of each species is crucial for managing arbovirus spread, particularly in areas where they coexist. Methodology/Principal FindingsWe conducted an entomological survey of A. aegypti and A. albopictus (larvae, pupae, and adults) in urban and rural areas of four municipalities across different elevations (200-2200 meters above sea level) in Colombia. Household conditions and knowledge of DENV were assessed through interviews. Female A. albopictus were tested individually for arbovirus RNA, while A. aegypti were tested in pools. Both species were found up to 2100 masl. A. aegypti comprised 78% of the immature forms collected, while A. albopictus made up 22%. Larvae from both species coexisted in common artificial breeding sites in urban and rural areas, with no evidence of competition. A. albopictus preferred rural areas, lower elevations (<1500 masl), high precipitation (>270 mm), and poor household conditions, while A. aegypti was more abundant in urban areas, intradomicile environments, and areas with moderate precipitation (100-400 mm). Biting risk was higher for A. aegypti (0.02-0.22 females per person), particularly in urban areas, while A. albopictus exhibited lower biting risk (0.001-0.08), with the highest values in rural Patia. Natural infections of DENV (12.4%) and CHIKV (12.4%) were found in A. aegypti, while A. albopictus showed CHIKV (41.2%) and DENV (23%) infections, with virus dissemination to the legs and salivary glands. Conclusions/SignificanceIntegrating household conditions and community knowledge with environmental data can enhance predictive models for vector presence and guide surveillance and educational strategies. Our findings highlight the need to consider A. albopictus as a potentially significant arbovirus vector in Colombia, especially given the presence of arboviruses in its salivary glands, its use of artificial breeding sites, its biting risk inside homes, and its differing ecological preferences and seasonal associations compared to A. aegypti. AUTHOR SUMMARYIn this study, we investigated the ecological and epidemiological dynamics of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus and their natural infection with DENV, ZIKV, and CHIKV in Colombia. An entomological survey conducted across four municipalities revealed distinct environmental and human-related factors influencing the distribution and abundance of these species. A. aegypti was more abundant in urban environments, favoring areas with lowest precipitation and a range of household conditions, while A. albopictus was more common in rural areas with higher precipitation and poorer household conditions. Both species were naturally infected with DENV and CHIKV, with A. albopictus showing the ability to disseminate, as indicated by their presence in the legs and salivary glands. Our findings underscore the importance of understanding species-specific ecological characteristics and incorporating community knowledge into predictive models to improve vector surveillance and control strategies, particularly in regions where both species coexist and contribute to arbovirus transmission.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bionomics of Aedes aegypti during the 2016-2017 dengue outbreaks in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso 99%
- New traps for the capture of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) eggs and adults 98%
- Mosquito surveillance on U.S military installations as part of a Japanese encephalitis virus detection program: 2016 to 2021 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Household-Level Risk Factors for Aedes aegypti Pupal Density in Guayaquil, Ecuador 98%
- An assessment of adult mosquito collection techniques for studying species abundance and diversity in Maferinyah, Guinea 98%
- The Mosquito Electrocuting Trap As An Exposure-Free Method For Measuring Human Biting Rates By Aedes Mosquito Vectors 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population dynamics of the primary malaria vector Nyssorhynchus darlingi in a high transmission setting dominated by fish farming in western Amazonian Brazil 98%
- Larval ecology and bionomics of Anopheles funestus in highland and lowland sites in western Kenya 98%
- Zika and dengue viruses infecting wild-caught mosquitoes in an environmental protection area in Brazil 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Urban ecology of arboviral mosquito vectors along the Kenyan coast 96%
- Quantification of human-mosquito contact rate using surveys and its application in determining dengue viral transmission risk 95%
- Expansive and diverse phenotypic landscape of field Aedes aegypti larvae with differential susceptibility to temephos: beyond metabolic detoxification 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Field efficacy of guppies and pyriproxyfen (Sumilarv(R) 2MR) combined with community engagement on dengue vectors in Cambodia: a randomized controlled trial 96%
- Early-evening biting by Anopheles stephensi in Southern Ethiopia: A Challenge for Bed Net Use as Vector Control in Africa 95%
- Spatiotemporal tools for emerging and endemic disease hotspots in small areas--an analysis of dengue and chikungunya in Barbados, 2013 - 2016 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.