Back

A quantitative multi-parameter mapping protocol standardized for clinical research in autoimmune neuroinflammatory diseases with white matter abnormalities

Trang, H.; Hartung, T.; Chen, Q.; Hetzer, S.; Chien, C.; Sperber, P. S.; Schmitz-Huebsch, T.; Asseyer, S.; Rust, R.; Mewes, D.; Anderhalten, L. C.; Sy, M.; Brandt, A. U.; Finke, C.; Paul, F.

2024-10-07 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.10.07.24315008 medRxiv
Show abstract

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) involves mapping microstructure in standardized units sensitive to histological properties and supplements conventional MRI, which relies on contrast weighted images where intensities have no biophysical meaning. While measuring tissue properties such as myelin, iron or water content is desired in a disease context, qMRI changes may typically reflect mixed influences from aging or pre-clinical degeneration. We used a fast multi-parameter mapping (MPM) protocol for clinical routine at 3T to reconstruct whole-brain quantitative maps of magnetization transfer saturation (MT), proton density (PD), longitudinal (R1), and transverse relaxation rate (R2*) with 1.6 mm isotropic resolution. We report reference MPM values from a healthy population with age and gender distributions typical of neuroimmunology studies in whole brain white matter (WM), T2-weighted WM hyperintensities, cortical grey matter and deep grey matter regions and present post-processing optimizations including integration of lesions and normalization of PD maps against cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for standardized research in multiple sclerosis (MS) and related disorders. PD maps were affected by WM abnormalities in MS using WM calibration. The results acknowledge the impact of non-linear age effects on MPM and suggest using CSF calibration for future clinical application in autoimmune neuroinflammatory diseases with WM abnormalities.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.