Multi-source coherence analysis of the first European multi-centre cohort study for cancer prevention in people experiencing homelessness: a data quality study
Blasco-Calafat, A.; Blanes-Selva, V.; Fragner, T.; Donate-Martinez, A.; Alhambra-Borras, T.; Garcia-Gomez, J. M.; Grabovac, I.; Saez, C.
Show abstract
Background and objectivePeople experiencing homelessness (PEH) face significant health challenges and disparities in healthcare access due to barriers such as unstable housing, limited resources, and social stigma. In response, the European Union has initiated efforts to address these disparities. The CANCERLESS project, part of this initiative, has created the first European multi-centre dataset for cancer prevention in PEH. This work aims to evaluate and describe the heterogeneity of PEH across pilot sites and to provide data quality metrics for reliable future research. MethodsThe dataset comprises 652 cases: 142 from Vienna, 158 from Athens and Thessaloniki, 197 from Madrid, and 155 from the United Kingdom. All participants fit classifications from the European Typology of Homelessness and Housing Exclusion. This longitudinal study collected questionnaires at baseline, four weeks, and at the end of the intervention. The 180-question survey covered socio-demographic data, overall health, mental health, empowerment, and interpersonal communication. Data variability was assessed using information theory and geometric methods to analyse discrepancies in distributions and completeness across the dataset. ResultsSignificant variability was found among the four pilot countries, both overall and within specific sections, except for the health section. Madrid showed the largest discrepancies, with a high number of missing values related to interpersonal communication and healthcare service use. ConclusionHealth data may be comparable across the four countries, but further analysis should account for location-specific differences. This study underscores the heterogeneity among PEH and the critical need for data quality assessments to inform future research and policymaking in this field.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 95%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 94%
- Cohort Study Protocol of the Brazilian Collaborative Research Network on COVID-19: strengthening WHO global data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Interventions and Quality of Home-based Primary Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- Nowcasting and Forecasting the Spread of COVID-19 and Healthcare Demand In Turkey, A Modelling Study 93%
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions and willingness of patients and caregivers on the utilization of patient-generated health data: a cross-sectional survey 94%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 94%
- Half Year Longitudinal Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-antibodies and Rule Compliance in German Hospital Employees 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 96%
- Substantial SF-36 score differences according to the mode of administration of the questionnaire: an ancillary study of the SENTIPAT multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing web-based questionnaire self-completion and telephone interview 94%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.