Back

Compression and k-mer based Approach For Anticancer Peptide Analysis

Ali, S.; Ali, T. E.; Chourasia, P.; Patterson, M.

2024-10-08 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.10.05.616787 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Our research delves into the imperative realm of anti-cancer peptide sequence analysis, an essential domain for biological researchers. Presently, neural network-based methodologies, while exhibiting precision, encounter challenges with a substantial parameter count and extensive data requirements. The recently proposed method to compute the pairwise distance between the sequences using the compression-based approach [26] focuses on compressing entire sequences, potentially overlooking intricate neighboring information for individual characters (i.e., amino acids in the case of protein and nucleotide in the case of nucleotide) within a sequence. The importance of neighboring information lies in its ability to provide context and enhance understanding at a finer level within the sequences being analyzed. Our study advocates an innovative paradigm, where we integrate classical compression algorithms, such as Gzip, with a pioneering k-mersbased strategy in an incremental fashion. Diverging from conventional techniques, our method entails compressing individual k-mers and incrementally constructing the compression for subsequences, ensuring more careful consideration of neighboring information for each character. Our proposed method improves classification performance without necessitating custom features or pre-trained models. Our approach unifies compression, Normalized Compression Distance, and k-mers-based techniques to generate embeddings, which are then used for classification. This synergy facilitates a nuanced understanding of cancer sequences, surpassing state-of-the-art methods in predictive accuracy on the Anti-Cancer Peptides dataset. Moreover, our methodology provides a practical and efficient alternative to computationally demanding Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), proving effective even in low-resource environments.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.