No maternal health without mental health: suggested indicators to monitor perinatal mental health globally
Palestra, F.; Moran, A. C.; Chowdhary, N.; Salisbury, T. T.; Dua, T.; McNab, S.; Layton, E.; Kennedy, E.; Homer, C.; Fisher, J.; Honikman, S.; Hill, Z.
Show abstract
Perinatal mental health refers to the psychological wellbeing of women during pregnancy and up to one year postpartum. Perinatal mental health conditions as depression significantly affect maternal, newborn health, and child development worldwide. However, the absence of standardized indicators limits effective monitoring and evaluation. This paper introduces a framework with indicators for global perinatal mental health monitoring. The framework development involved a scoping review, expert consultations, and stakeholder surveys. A global expert group, guided by evidence and the World Health Organization (WHO), identified an initial set of indicators. Two rounds of online surveys were conducted, allowing stakeholders to rank these indicators and suggest additional ones. Indicators were chosen based on their validity, reliability, relevance, feasibility, and potential impact for advocacy purposes on perinatal mental health. The WHO expert working group finalized the set of indicators. Six perinatal mental health indicators were identified for future testing. These include three primary indicators: policy presence, screening coverage, and prevalence of perinatal mental health conditions. Three secondary indicators cover mental health expenditure, healthcare professional training, and provision of care. Challenges to implementing standardized monitoring include resource limitations and data collection methods. Strengthening health workers and facility capacity to measure, report, and interpret perinatal mental health data, including the use of screening tools, is crucial. The integration of these indicators into existing systems, such as health information management systems (HIMS) and national surveys, will be key. Monitoring perinatal mental health is essential for improving maternal and newborn outcomes. The proposed framework offers a means to enhance global monitoring and guide policy interventions. Global stakeholders are encouraged to integrate perinatal mental health into their policy, program, and monitoring agendas.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health care in the city of Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo: Analysis of demand, supply and operational response capacity of the health district of Tshamilemba 96%
- Adoption of policies to improve respectful maternity care in Timor-Leste 95%
- Maternity care professionals’ preparedness for and experiences of screening and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The COVID in the Context of Pregnancy, Infancy and Parenting (CoCoPIP) Study: protocol for a longitudinal study of parental mental health, social interactions, physical growth, and cognitive development of infants during the pandemic 94%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization of Facility-Based Essential Maternal and Child Health Services in North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding care-seeking of pregnant women from underserved groups: A systematic review and meta-ethnography 92%
- SDG5 ‘Gender Equality’ and the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid assessment of health system responses in selected upper-middle and high-income countries 92%
- Impact of the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic on coverage of RMNH interventions in Ethiopia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health challenges and the associated factors in HIV-positive women who have children living with HIV in Indonesia: A qualitative study 92%
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 91%
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Mental Illness Symptoms in Spain in the COVID-19 Crisis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.