Back

Analyzing Biodiversity in Protected vs. Unprotected Tide Pools

Chen, V.; Campbell, R.; Chirputkar, A.; Tran, E.; Chaturvedi, P.; Han, S.; Lu, A.; Chu, Z.; Erb, M.; Mehta, T.; Bindal, V.; Lee, I.; Benson, A.; Adams, C. T.

2024-10-04 ecology
10.1101/2024.10.03.616586 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study assessed the efficacy of marine protected areas (MPAs) by comparing tide pool biodiversity in Half Moon Bay, California between a protected site (Fitzgerald Marine Reserve) and an unprotected site (Mavericks Beach). Samples were collected through random quadrat surveys. ImageJ and RStudio were used to analyze data through three methods utilizing the Simpsons Diversity Index along with three metrics. The unprotected Mavericks Beach displayed greater biodiversity through two metrics while the third did not find significant difference in biodiversity between sites. 30 unique species were present at each site with 43 species between both. These mixed findings prevent us from drawing definitive conclusions on the effectiveness of Half Moon Bays tide pool MPAs but suggest the MPA is less biodiverse. Potential explanations include the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis, lack of sample size, or that the MPA is not effective in maintaining biodiversity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.