Computational Phenotyping of Electroconvulsive Therapy Outcomes in Treatment-Resistant Depression
Jones, R.; Sands, L. P.; Trattner, J.; Jiang, A.; Johnson, C. k.; Gligorovic, P. V.; Douglas, H. E.; Ramos, R.; Kishida, K. T.
Show abstract
IMPORTANCEElectroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective medical procedure for patients with treatment-resistant depression. However, quantitative neural and behavioral measures that characterize how patients respond to ECT treatment are largely lacking. OBJECTIVEDetermine whether neurocomputational models that integrate information about adaptive learning behavior and associated affective experiences can characterize neurobehavioral changes in patients whose depression improves following ECT treatment. DESIGNThis observational study included two research visits from 2020-2023 that occurred before and after standard-of-care ECT for treatment-resistant depression. This report focuses on "visit 2", which occurred after patients received their initial ECT treatment series. SETTINGWake Forest University School of Medicine; Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Psychiatric Outpatient Center; Atrium Health Wake Forest Hospital. PARTICIPANTSParticipants who received ECT for treatment-resistant depression ("ECT"), and participants not receiving ECT but with depression ("non-ECT") or without depression ("no-depression") were recruited from the Psychiatric Outpatient Center and community, respectively. EXPOSURESComputerized delivery of a Probabilistic Reward and Punishment with Subjective Rating task with functional magnetic resonance imaging. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESComputational modeling of choice behavior provided parameters that characterized learning dynamics and associated affect dynamics expressed through intermittent Likert scale self-reports. Multivariate statistical analyses relating model parameters, neurobehavioral responses, and clinical assessments. RESULTSECT (N=21; 47.6% female), non-ECT (N=36; 69.4% female), and no-depression (N=38; 65.8% female) participants. Parameters derived from computational models fit to behavior elicited during learning and the expression of affective experiences for all groups reveled specific changes in patients who responded favorably to ECT. ECT-responders demonstrated increased rates of learning from rewarding trials, normalized affective response to punishments, and an increase in the influence of counterfactual missed opportunities on affective behavior. Additionally, ECT-responders showed changes in BOLD activity regions specific to each of these parameters. ECT-responders BOLD-responses to surprising punishments and counterfactual missed opportunities were altered from visit 1 to visit 2 in the inferior frontal operculum, Rolandic operculum, precentral gyrus, and caudate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEComputational models of neurobehavioral dynamics associated with learning and affect can describe specific hypotheses about neurocomputational-mechanisms underlying favorable responses to treatment-resistant depression. Our results suggest computational estimates of learning and affective dynamics may aid in identifying depression phenotypes and treatment outcomes in psychiatric medicine where objective measures are largely lacking. KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQUESTIONC_ST_ABSHow does ECT treatment change neurocomputational measures of learning and affective experiences in patients with treatment-resistant depression? FINDINGSIn this observational study, computational models were used to quantify the behavioral dynamics of learning and associated changes in subjective feelings in patients who underwent ECT treatment for treatment resistant depression and controls. In ECT-responders we observed increases in reward-based learning, normalized affective responses to surprising positive and negative outcomes, and associated changes in fMRI-measured BOLD-responses. MEANINGComputational phenotyping of task behavior and associated brain responses provides quantification of complex neurobehavioral dynamics and provides specific insight into the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying successful ECT treatment.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A computational approach to understanding effort-based decision-making in depression 96%
- A common symptom geometry of mood improvement under sertraline and placebo associated with distinct neural patterns 95%
- Distinct neurofunctional alterations during motivational and hedonic processing of natural and monetary rewards in depression – a neuroimaging meta-analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maladaptive avoidance learning in the orbitofrontal cortex in adolescents with major depression 94%
- Cognitive Phenotype Shifts in Risk-Taking: Interplay of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Behaviors and Intensified Depression 94%
- Machine learning identifies large-scale reward-related activity modulated by dopaminergic enhancement in major depression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 95%
- Meta-analysis of Reward Processing in Major Depressive Disorder Reveals Distinct Abnormalities within the Reward Circuit 94%
- Magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive therapy increase frontal aperiodic activity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural signatures of risk-taking adaptions across health, bipolar disorder, and lithium treatment 95%
- Clinical Response to Neurofeedback in Major Depression Relates to Subtypes of Whole-Brain Activation Patterns During Training 94%
- Directed exploration is elevated in affective disorders but reduced by an aversive interoceptive state induction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive Patterns of Antidepressant Response from Pre-Treatment Reward Processing using Functional MRI and Deep Learning: Key Results from the EMBARC Randomized Clinical Trial 96%
- Heterogeneity in Depression: evidence for distinct clinical and neurobiological profiles 95%
- Low predictive power of clinical features for relapse prediction after antidepressant discontinuation in a naturalistic setting 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.