Back

A Metagenomic Study of Antibiotic Resistance Across Diverse Soil Types and Geographical Locations

Pillay, S.; Tepeli, Y. I.; van Lent, P.; Abeel, T.

2024-10-29 microbiology
10.1101/2024.09.30.615846 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSoil naturally harbours antibiotic resistant bacteria and is considered to be a reservoir for antibiotic resistance. The overuse of antibiotics across human, animal, and environmental sectors has intensified this issue leading to an increased acquisition of antibiotic resistant genes by bacteria in soil. Various biogeographical factors, such as soil pH, temperature, and pollutants, play a role in the spread and emergence of antibiotic resistance in soil. In this study, we utilised publicly available metagenomic datasets from four different soil types (rhizosphere, urban, natural, and rural areas) sampled from nine distinct geographic locations to explore the patterns of antibiotic resistance in soils from different regions. ResultsBradyrhizobium was predominant in vegetation soil types regardless of soil pH and temperature. ESKAPE pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa was prevalent in rural soil samples. Antibiotic resistance gene families such as 16s rRNA with mutations conferring resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics, OXA {beta}-lactamase, ANT(3), and the RND and MFS efflux pump gene were identified in all soil types, with their abundances influenced by anthropogenic activities, vegetation, and climate in different geographical locations. Plasmids were more abundant in rural soils and were linked to aminoglycoside resistance. Integrons and integrative elements identified were associated with commonly used and naturally occurring antibiotics, showing similar abundances across different soil types and geographical locations. ConclusionAntimicrobial resistance in soil may be driven by anthropogenic activities and biogeographical factors, increasing the risk of bacteria developing resistance and leading to higher morbidity and mortality rates in humans and animals.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.7%
2
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
4
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
6
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
20
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Archives of Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%