Back

Long-Read Sequencing Increases Diagnostic Yield for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Redfield, S. E.; Shao, W.; Sun, T.; Pastolero, A.; Rowell, W. J.; French, C. E.; Nolan, C.; Holt, J. M.; Saunders, C. T.; Fanslow, C.; Lampraki, E. M.; Lambert, C.; Kenna, M.; Eberle, M.; Rockowitz, S.; Shearer, A. E.

2024-09-30 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.09.30.24314377 medRxiv
Show abstract

The diagnostic yield of genetic testing for pediatric sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has remained at around 40% for over a decade despite newly discovered causative genes and the expanded use of exome sequencing (ES). This stagnation may be due to (1) a focus on coding regions of the genome and (2) an inability to resolve variants in complex genomic regions due to reliance on short-read sequencing technologies. Short-read genome sequencing (srGS) and long-read genome sequencing (lrGS) both provide exonic single nucleotide variant (SNV) and small indel detection at the same sensitivity as ES, but also evaluate intronic regions. lrGS provides improved resolution for structural variants (SV) and repetitive genomic regions. We sought to investigate the potential utility of lrGS in the diagnostic evaluation of a small cohort of patients with SNHL of unknown etiology after ES and srGS. 19 pediatric patients with SNHL underwent lrGS via PacBio SMRT sequencing. Sequencing data were processed using the PacBio WGS variant pipeline. The diagnostic yield for this lrGS cohort was 4/19 (21%). Relevant variants detected only with lrGS included a hemizygous deletion in trans with a missense variant in an area of high genomic homology (OTOA) and two single nucleotide loss-of-function variants in trans to a known copy-number-loss for a gene with a highly homologous pseudogene (STRC). A complex inversion was identified in the MITF gene which was also identified on post-hoc analysis by srGS. LrGS provides improved resolution for complex genomic structural variation which may increase diagnostic yield for genetic pediatric SNHL, and, potentially, rare disease more broadly.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
3
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
13
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
20
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%