Long-Read Sequencing Increases Diagnostic Yield for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Redfield, S. E.; Shao, W.; Sun, T.; Pastolero, A.; Rowell, W. J.; French, C. E.; Nolan, C.; Holt, J. M.; Saunders, C. T.; Fanslow, C.; Lampraki, E. M.; Lambert, C.; Kenna, M.; Eberle, M.; Rockowitz, S.; Shearer, A. E.
Show abstract
The diagnostic yield of genetic testing for pediatric sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has remained at around 40% for over a decade despite newly discovered causative genes and the expanded use of exome sequencing (ES). This stagnation may be due to (1) a focus on coding regions of the genome and (2) an inability to resolve variants in complex genomic regions due to reliance on short-read sequencing technologies. Short-read genome sequencing (srGS) and long-read genome sequencing (lrGS) both provide exonic single nucleotide variant (SNV) and small indel detection at the same sensitivity as ES, but also evaluate intronic regions. lrGS provides improved resolution for structural variants (SV) and repetitive genomic regions. We sought to investigate the potential utility of lrGS in the diagnostic evaluation of a small cohort of patients with SNHL of unknown etiology after ES and srGS. 19 pediatric patients with SNHL underwent lrGS via PacBio SMRT sequencing. Sequencing data were processed using the PacBio WGS variant pipeline. The diagnostic yield for this lrGS cohort was 4/19 (21%). Relevant variants detected only with lrGS included a hemizygous deletion in trans with a missense variant in an area of high genomic homology (OTOA) and two single nucleotide loss-of-function variants in trans to a known copy-number-loss for a gene with a highly homologous pseudogene (STRC). A complex inversion was identified in the MITF gene which was also identified on post-hoc analysis by srGS. LrGS provides improved resolution for complex genomic structural variation which may increase diagnostic yield for genetic pediatric SNHL, and, potentially, rare disease more broadly.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Next-generation phenotyping in Nigerian children with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome 93%
- Resolving the diagnostic odyssey in inherited retinal dystrophies through long-read genome sequencing 93%
- Rare variants found in multiplex families with orofacial clefts: Does expanding the phenotype make a difference? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A RIPOR2 in-frame deletion is a frequent and highly penetrant cause of adult-onset hearing loss 94%
- Clinical description, molecular delineation and genotype-phenotype correlation in 340 patients with KBG syndrome: Addition of 67 new patients 92%
- A comparative medical genomics approach may facilitate the interpretation of rare missense variation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- VIP-HL: Semi-automated ACMG/AMP variant interpretation platform for genetic hearing loss 94%
- Whole genome sequencing of ‘mutation-negative’ individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome 91%
- Using single molecule Molecular Inversion Probes as a cost-effective, high-throughput sequencing approach to target all genes and loci associated with macular diseases 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disease-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines improve sequence variant interpretation for hearing loss 95%
- Consensus interpretation of the Met34Thr and Val37Ile variants in GJB2 by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel 94%
- Genome sequencing reveals the impact of non-canonical exon inclusions in rare genetic disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel Loss-of-Function Mutations in COCH Cause Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Deafness 95%
- Comprehensive simulation and interpretation of single nucleotide substitutions in GJB2 reveals the genetic and phenotypic landscape of GJB2-related hearing loss 94%
- PKHD1L1 , A Gene Involved in the Stereociliary Coat, Causes Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.