Back

Implications of source-sink feedbacks for modelling tree carbon assimilation and growth

Friend, A. D.; Chen, Y.; Eckes-Shephard, A. H.; Fonti, P.; Hellmann, E.; Rademacher, T. T.; Richardson, A. D.; Thomas, P. R.

2025-07-15 plant biology
10.1101/2024.09.27.615358 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Current global models of vegetation dynamics are largely carbon (C) source-driven, with behaviour primarily determined by the environmental responses of photosynthesis. However, real plants operate as integrated wholes, with feedbacks between sources, such as photosynthesis, and sinks, such as growth, resulting in homeostatic concentrations of metabolites such as sugars. A parsimonious approach to implementing this homeostatic coupling of C sources and sinks in a tree growth model is presented, and its implications for the responses of net photosynthesis and growth to environmental factors and tree size assessed. Hill functions describe inhibition of C sources (net photosynthesis) and activation of sinks (structural growth) as sucrose concentration increases. The model is parameterised for a typical tree growing at a site in the Amazonian rainforest and its qualitative behaviour is found to be consistent with observations. A key outcome is that sinks and sources strongly regulate each other. Hence environmental factors that affect potential net photosynthesis, such as atmospheric CO2, have greatly reduced effects on growth when homeostatic feedbacks from sucrose concentrations are considered. For example, compared with a C-source-only-driven approach (as in most current global models), the response of tree biomass for a tree currently 300 yr old, to increasing atmospheric CO2 projected to the end of this century under a high scenario, is reduced by ca.77%, from +122% to +29%, with net photosynthesis and growth rate responses reduced by a similar amount. Furthermore, in this coupled approach, any direct controls on growth (either environmental or through phenological controls on xylogensis) will influence source activity through the sucrose feedback. For example, a reduction in potential growth through temperature constraints on cell-wall construction increases sucrose concentrations, resulting in a compensating reduction in net photosynthesis. While net photosynthesis controls growth, growth controls net photosynthesis. In addition, we find a strong effect of changing tree allometry on C source-sink relations as the tree grows. Larger trees are less source-limited due to a higher ratio of sapwood area (and hence potential C assimilation rate) to potential growth rate, consistent with the observed decline in growth response to atmospheric CO2 as trees age. We suggest that the implications of including C source-sink coupling in models of vegetation dynamics, such as dynamic global vegetation models, are likely to be profound.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.1%
3
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.6%
10
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.1%
13
Tree Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
23
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
30
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%