Trial-level factors affecting accrual rate of systemic sclerosis randomized clinical trials over 20 years.
RUSSO, B.; CHIRICA, I.-S.; COURVOISIER, D. S.; IUDICI, M.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo estimate the average time to complete patient enrollment and identify factors associated with accrual rates in systemic sclerosis (SSc) randomized controlled trials (RCTs). MethodsWe searched published SSc-RCTs indexed in PubMed from 2000 to 2024, selecting those with recruitment completed before the COVID-19 pandemic. We recorded key trial features (country, phase, randomization ratio, intervention, blinding, funding source, outcome type) and enrollment year(s). We measured enrollment duration and accrual rate (participants per month). A multivariable negative binomial generalized linear model was used to identify factors associated with accrual rate. ResultsWe included 80 studies, mostly single-country (75.0%) and industry-funded (57.5%), mainly recruiting in Europe (36.2%) and North America (22.5%). In 65% of studies, both limited and diffuse SSc patients were enrolled. The median sample size was 40.5 patients, with 20% of RCTs enrolling [≥]100 patients. The median recruitment time was 15 months (IQR 9.9 - 30.0), with a median accrual rate of 3.1 (IQR 1.6 - 5.5) participants per month. Recruitment rates varied over time, with faster accrual early in the 2000s and after 2012, and a slower period in between. Multivariable analysis showed that accrual rate was positively associated with skewed randomization, non-industry funding, international recruitment, and inclusion of both SSc subsets, especially compared to studies involving only dcSSc patients. ConclusionsRecruiting SSc patients for RCTs has been challenging, with generally slow accrual over the past 20 years and no significant improvement over time.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial and ethnic associations with interstitial lung disease and healthcare utilization in patients with systemic sclerosis 91%
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Incidence Rate of Takayasu Arteritis 91%
- Use of Physician Global Assessment (PGA) in Systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of its psychometric properties 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmacological treatment for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung involvement: Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses 96%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 92%
- Refractory Inflammatory Arthritis definition and model generated through patient and multi-disciplinary professional modified Delphi process 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of patient-reported outcome measures for dactylitis, psoriatic skin and nail disease, and uveitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis in routine care 92%
- Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA): clinical issues at early stages of disease 90%
- Humoral and cellular immune responses upon SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with anti-CD20 therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1342 patients 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA-Seq analysis identifies novel roles for the primary cilia gene SPAG17 and the SOX9 locus non-coding RNAs in systemic sclerosis 91%
- Functional genomics in primary T cells and monocytes identifies mechanisms by which genetic susceptibility loci influence systemic sclerosis risk 90%
- Nuclear receptor subfamily 4A signaling as a key disease pathway of CD1c+ dendritic cell dysregulation in systemic sclerosis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing the outcomes of non-pharmacological interventions for managing fatigue across the lifespan of people living with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions: a scoping review protocol 92%
- Diagnostic delay of Myositis: protocol for an integrated systematic review 92%
- CATALYST trial protocol: A multicentre, open-label, phase II, multi-arm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.