Back

Screening for avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in primary care: clinical presentation and validation of the ARFID-Brief Screener in Swedish preschoolers

Dinkler, L.; Brimo, K.; Holmang, H.; Yasumitsu-Lovell, K.; Kuja-Halkola, R.; Kantzer, A.-K.; Omanovic, Z.; Suganuma, N.; Eitoku, M.; Fujieda, M.; Fernell, E.; Mollborg, P.; Bryant-Waugh, R.; Gillberg, C.; Rastam, M.

2024-09-28 pediatrics
10.1101/2024.09.26.24314270 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite its common early onset, little is known about the prevalence and clinical presentation of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in very young children, hindering early identification and intervention. Differentiating ARFID from normative selective eating is particularly challenging, yet validated parent-reported screening tools are lacking. This study aimed to estimate the point prevalence and describe the clinical characteristics of ARFID in preschoolers. It also evaluated the psychometric properties of the parent-reported ARFID-Brief Screener by assessing its agreement with a diagnostic interview for ARFID. MethodsParents of 645 children (50.5% male, mean age 3.2 years) completed the ARFID-Brief Screener and a neurodevelopmental screener during 2.5- and 4-year routine check-ups at 21 child health centers in West Sweden. Parents of all screen-positive and of randomly selected screen-negative children were invited to a follow-up diagnostic interview via phone. Additional clinical data were extracted from health records. ResultsOf the 42 children (6.5%) who screened positive for ARFID, 29 were followed up via diagnostic interview, and 21 received an ARFID diagnosis, yielding a positive predictive value of 72%. Negative predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of the ARFID-Brief Screener were 94%, 91%, 79%, and 84%, respectively. The estimated point prevalence of ARFID was 5.9%. All diagnosed children exhibited both sensory-based avoidance and low interest in eating. Only 13.5% met ARFID criteria based on weight- or nutrition-related impairment (DSM-5 Criteria A1-A3). Two fifths (39.1%) of children with ARFID exhibited early language delays compared to 13.5% of children without ARFID. More extensive neurodevelopmental problems were associated with greater ARFID severity and with higher scores on the sensory and concern profiles. ConclusionsARFID is not uncommon among preschoolers, though prevalence may be slightly overestimated in this study. It is primarily characterized by sensory-based avoidance and low interest in eating, and by psychosocial impairment instead of physical health consequences, underscoring the need to assess impact beyond weight, growth, and nutrition. Early neurodevelopmental difficulties are overrepresented, highlighting their relevance for early detection and intervention. The ARFID-Brief Screener demonstrated promising psychometric properties and may be a valuable tool for routine screening, though follow-up assessments remain necessary to confirm a diagnoses. Plain English summaryAvoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) often starts early in life, but little is known about how common it is in very young children. This study looked at how many preschool-aged children have ARFID and what their eating difficulties look like. We also tested how well a short parent questionnaire, the ARFID-Brief Screener, can help identify children at risk. Parents of 645 Swedish children filled out the screener during routine health check-ups at age 2.5 or 5. Children who screened positive and a randomly selected group of screen-negative children were invited to a follow-up interview. Based on these interviews, we estimated that about 5.9% of preschoolers may have ARFID. All children with ARFID avoided food due to sensory sensitivities or had little interest in eating. Few had weight or nutrition problems, but many experienced difficulties in daily life, such as stressful mealtimes. Children with ARFID were more likely to have early neurodevelopmental challenges such as delayed language development, suggesting that these symptoms may aid in identifying children at risk for ARFID. The ARFID-Brief Screener performed well in detecting at-risk children, but follow-up assessments are still needed to confirm a diagnosis.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
4
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
7
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.9%
10
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
16
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%