Back

Molecular Diagnosis of Heart Allograft Rejection Using Intra-Graft Targeted Gene Expression Profiling: the heart HistoMX system

Giarraputo, A.; COUTANCE, G.; Patel, J. K.; Fedrigo, M.; Aubert, O.; Dagobert, J.; Mezine, F.; Robin, B.; Rouvier, P.; Varnous, S.; Duong Van Huyen, J.-P.; Bruneval, P.; Angelini, A.; Kobashigawa, J.; Loupy, A.

2024-09-25 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.09.24.24314238 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and aimsTissular gene expression profiling has the potential to refine the diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection. Contrary to whole-transcriptome approaches, targeted molecular profiling applicable to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) can be easily implemented in clinical practice. We aimed to develop and validate the first rejection molecular diagnostic system dedicated to heart transplantation (HTx). MethodsAn international multicenter study was designed, building a deep phenotyped cohort of HTx recipients recruited between 2011 and 2021 at 4 referral centers. Detailed donors, recipients, clinical, immunological, biological, and histological parameters were collected. EMBs were graded according to international working formulations. Tissue gene expression was analyzed on FFPE-EMB using the consensus Banff Human Organ Transplant gene set. Molecular classifiers of antibody-mediated (AMR) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) were built. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in the development and validation sets (NCT06436027). ResultsA total of 591 biopsies were included: 188 AMR (pAMR1(I+): n=51; pAMR1(H+): n=58; pAMR2-3: n=79), 289 ACR (1R n=174; 2-3R n=115) and 114 matched non-rejection cases. Biopsies were split in a derivation (n=476) and a validation set (n=115). AMR top significant transcripts were related to the IFN-gamma inducible pathway, endothelial activation, and monocyte-macrophage recruitment. ACR was characterized by transcripts related to T-cell receptor, CD3 receptor activation, and CD28 signaling. ACR and AMR molecular rejection models were strongly associated with the pathology severity of rejection and accurately identified rejection in the derivation (ROC-AUC: AMR=0.831, ACR:=0.837) and validation sets (ROC-AUC: AMR=0.812; ACR=0.849). Calibration was adequate. The robustness of the molecular classifiers were reinforced by various sensitivity analyzes. An automated report was developed to enhance the reproducibility and clinical applicability of the molecular analysis. ConclusionsIn this study, the first tissue-based rejection molecular diagnostic system applicable to FFPE- EMB and dedicated to heart transplantation rejection was developed and internally validated. This tool has the potential to refine the diagnosis of rejection.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
50.0%
50% of probability mass above
2
American Journal of Transplantation
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
5
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
10
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Diabetologia
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Transfusion
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
17
Journal of Hepatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Journal of Advanced Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
20
Kidney International
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
21
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Kidney International Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.6%