Back

Molecular Diagnosis of Heart Allograft Rejection Using Intra-Graft Targeted Gene Expression Profiling: the heart HistoMX system

Giarraputo, A.; COUTANCE, G.; Patel, J. K.; Fedrigo, M.; Aubert, O.; Dagobert, J.; Mezine, F.; Robin, B.; Rouvier, P.; Varnous, S.; Duong Van Huyen, J.-P.; Bruneval, P.; Angelini, A.; Kobashigawa, J.; Loupy, A.

2024-09-25 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.09.24.24314238 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and aimsTissular gene expression profiling has the potential to refine the diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection. Contrary to whole-transcriptome approaches, targeted molecular profiling applicable to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) can be easily implemented in clinical practice. We aimed to develop and validate the first rejection molecular diagnostic system dedicated to heart transplantation (HTx). MethodsAn international multicenter study was designed, building a deep phenotyped cohort of HTx recipients recruited between 2011 and 2021 at 4 referral centers. Detailed donors, recipients, clinical, immunological, biological, and histological parameters were collected. EMBs were graded according to international working formulations. Tissue gene expression was analyzed on FFPE-EMB using the consensus Banff Human Organ Transplant gene set. Molecular classifiers of antibody-mediated (AMR) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) were built. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in the development and validation sets (NCT06436027). ResultsA total of 591 biopsies were included: 188 AMR (pAMR1(I+): n=51; pAMR1(H+): n=58; pAMR2-3: n=79), 289 ACR (1R n=174; 2-3R n=115) and 114 matched non-rejection cases. Biopsies were split in a derivation (n=476) and a validation set (n=115). AMR top significant transcripts were related to the IFN-gamma inducible pathway, endothelial activation, and monocyte-macrophage recruitment. ACR was characterized by transcripts related to T-cell receptor, CD3 receptor activation, and CD28 signaling. ACR and AMR molecular rejection models were strongly associated with the pathology severity of rejection and accurately identified rejection in the derivation (ROC-AUC: AMR=0.831, ACR:=0.837) and validation sets (ROC-AUC: AMR=0.812; ACR=0.849). Calibration was adequate. The robustness of the molecular classifiers were reinforced by various sensitivity analyzes. An automated report was developed to enhance the reproducibility and clinical applicability of the molecular analysis. ConclusionsIn this study, the first tissue-based rejection molecular diagnostic system applicable to FFPE- EMB and dedicated to heart transplantation rejection was developed and internally validated. This tool has the potential to refine the diagnosis of rejection.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.3%
2
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
7
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
8
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
11
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
16
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
23
Journal of Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Kidney International Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%