Back

WITHDRAWN: Comprehensive Analysis of Theoretical Models and Frameworks for Investigating Determinants of Breast Cancer Screening Participation: A Scoping Review

Zheng, D.; Sriyuktasuth, A.; Lekdamrongkul, P.

2024-11-01 nursing
10.1101/2024.09.23.24314256 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study aims to review and evaluate the effectiveness of various theoretical frameworks and models used over the past decade to explain the factors influencing BCS. MethodsA scoping review method was used to search the CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Chinese Biomedical Abstracts, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Ovid, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases. After literature screening and data extraction, the research results were summarized. Results55 studies were included and analyzed from the aspects of the application of theoretical models, explanatory effects, existing differences, commonalities and characteristics, and how to improve them. ConclusionThe effectiveness of these models varies by context and population. TPB and HBM are among the most empirically supported models, offering strong predictive power and practical guidance for interventions. Integrated models provide a comprehensive approach, addressing a broader range of influencing factors and demonstrating enhanced predictive capabilities. Future research should focus on refining these models and incorporating digital health tools to improve their applicability and effectiveness.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.