Back

Prognostic Value of CD8+ T-Cells at the Invasive Margin is Comparable to Immune Score in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Wankhede, D.; Kloor, M.; Halama, N.; Edelmann, D.; Brenner, H.; Hoffmeister, M.

2024-09-24 oncology
10.1101/2024.09.23.24314210 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Immunoscore(R) is a validated tool for predicting colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis, yet its adoption is impeded by complex commercial software and patient reimbursement challenges. Utilizing open-source methods, this study aimed to explore whether an immune cell score can be facilitated by focusing on single T-cell markers, to provide a simplified prognostic model in non-metastatic CRC. MethodsA multicentric prospective cohort study was conducted in non-metastatic CRC patients who underwent curative surgical resection. CD3+ and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were quantified in both invasive margin (IM) and tumor core (TC) using QuPath. A composite score, termed immune cell score, mirroring the methods employed for the Immunoscore(R), was calculated based on the TIL densities (CD3-IM, CD8-IM, CD3-TC, CD8-TC]. We used a split sample approach (70:30) to estimate adjusted hazard ratios of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in a training and a validation set. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) was performed to select the most prognostic TIL. The model incorporating the CART-selected TIL was compared to a two-tiered immune cell score model for overall performance (Brier score) and discrimination (concordance probability estimate, CPE). ResultsDuring a median follow-up time of 9.0 years, among 1260 patients, there were 203 CRC specific deaths. CART-selected CD8-IM was the most prognostic TIL at a cut-off of 231 cells/mm2. Patients with CD8-IMHi had better CSS than CD8-IMLow in both training (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.84) and validation sets (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21-0.60). Brier scores of CD-8IM and immune cell score survival models were comparable in both training and validation cohort, whereas the survival discrimination of CD8-IM slightly outperformed the immune cell score in the validation set (CPE: CD8-IM 0.748, IS 0.730). ConclusionA single TIL marker, specifically CD8-IM, provided prognostic information comparable to the immune cell score. Simplified and cost-effective TIL assessments could enhance their bench to bedside translation and may guide adjuvant therapy in early-stage CRC.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
2
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.7%
3
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.6%
5
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.0%
8
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
9
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
16
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.0%
21
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
27
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%