Relationship between Retinal Vessels and OCT-Derived Retinal Neural Parameters
Yusufu, M.; Weinreb, R. N.; Kang, M.; Vingrys, A. J.; Shang, X.; Zhang, L.; Shi, D.; He, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate structural relationships between retinal vasculometry derived from color fundus photography (CFP) and neural parameters obtained from Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) scans and validate their causal relationships. DesignCross-sectional study ParticipantsParticipants with fundus photographs data and OCT data in the UK Biobank cohort study MethodsWe used the Retina-based Microvascular Health Assessment System (RMHAS) to extract retinal vascular measurements in the 6*6mm area centered on the macular region. OCT parameters were available from the UK Biobank. First, pairwise correlations between individual retinal layers and vascular parameters were investigated. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was then used to examine associations between sets of variables. Lastly, bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization was employed to investigate potential causal relationships. Main Outcome MeasuresMeasurements of retinal vascular network and neural layers ResultsData from 67,918 eyes of 43,029 participants were included. The Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer (GC-IPL) thickness showed the strongest correlations with vascular Density and Complexity (r=0.199 for arterial Vessel Area Density and r=0.175 for Number of Segments). The Inner Nuclear Layer (INL) thickness showed positive correlations with Width (r=0.122) and Vessel Area Density (artery) (r=0.127). Mendelian randomization analysis indicated bidirectional causal relationships between retinal vascular features and layer thicknesses. Genetically predicted higher Vessel Density was associated with increased thickness across various retinal layers, with the strongest effect on Inner Segment/Outer Segment + Photoreceptor Segment thickness (standardized effect size 1.50, p<0.001). Genetically predicted increases in retinal layer thicknesses, particularly the Outer Plexiform Layer, were linked to higher Vessel Density (standardized effect size 0.45, p=0.002) and Fractal Dimension (standardized effect size 0.48, p<0.001). ConclusionsThe positive associations of macular thickness with vascular Density and Caliber measurements were mainly attributable to their associations with GC-IPL and INL. Multidimensional relationships revealed by CCA revealed a complementary nature between the two sets of parameters, highlighting their value as a composite biomarker. Mendelian Randomization uncovered a bidirectional causal relationship that should provide insights into novel therapeutic approaches targeting both vascular and neuronal components.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- U-shaped effect of blood pressure on structural OCT metrics and retinal blood flow autoregulation in ophthalmologically healthy subjects 97%
- Association between Drusen Burden Determined by OCT and Genetic Risk in Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration 96%
- Potential Structural Biomarkers in 3D Images Validated by the First Functional Biomarker for Early Age-Related Macular Degeneration - ALSTAR2 Baseline 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliability of retinal pathology quantification in age-related macular degeneration: Implications for clinical trials and machine learning applications 96%
- Visible light optical coherence tomography of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer reflectivity in glaucoma 96%
- Advanced Retinal Imaging and Ocular Parameters of the Rhesus Macaque Eye 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of OCT biomarker changes in treatment-naive neovascular AMD using a deep semantic segmentation algorithm 97%
- Association of renal function with diabetic retinopathy and macular edema among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 94%
- An Open-Source Dataset Of Anti-Vegf Therapy In Diabetic Macular Oedema Patients Over Four Years & Their Visual Outcomes 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.