Back

The response of multi-disease and insect-resistant tomato lines to the accumulation of TYLCV, a whitefly-transmitted virus

Prabhakar, S. S.; Hsu, Y.-c.; Yen, J.; Chou, H.-y.; Lin, M.-y.; Priya, M. S.; Ramasamy, S.; Eybishitz, A.

2024-09-23 plant biology
10.1101/2024.09.21.614278 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is a major vegetable crop grown worldwide for its culinary versatility and nutritional richness. The whitefly-transmitted Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) poses a significant threat to its cultivation. The management strategies for this disease include controlling the virus and/or the vector. The multi-disease and insect-resistant lines developed by the World Vegetable Centre (WorldVeg) contain Ty-1/Ty-3 genes for virus resistance and WF2-10 and WF3-09 genes for whitefly resistance. This study evaluates the efficacy of suppressing virus accumulation in multi-disease and insect-resistant tomato lines compared to Ty-resistant or whitefly-resistant lines and a susceptible check. Preference bioassays, controlled inoculation with viruliferous whiteflies, and acylsugar quantification revealed that multi-disease and insect-resistant lines, developed at WorldVeg, had significantly higher acylsugar concentration and were less preferred by the whitefly adults for settling and whiteflies had high adult mortality. The multi-disease and insect-resistant lines also showed less severe disease symptoms and reduced virus accumulation over time when compared to Ty-resistant, whitefly-resistant, and susceptible check. The findings reveal that the multi-disease and insect-resistant lines are superior in mitigating the threat posed by TYLCV compared to TYLCV-resistant lines. These results underscore the potential of combined virus and vector resistance in tomatoes as a key element of Integrated Pest Management strategies against whitefly-transmitted TYLCV, offering a sustainable solution for safeguarding tomato production.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.