AI-VOICE: A Method to Measure and Incorporate Patient Utilities Into AI-Informed Healthcare Workflows
Morse, K. E.; Higgins, M. C.; Qian, Y.; Callahan, A.; Shah, N. H.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatients are important participants in their medical care, yet artificial intelligence (AI) models are used to guide care with minimal patient input. This limitation is made partially worse due to a paucity of rigorous methods to measure and incorporate patient values of the tradeoffs inherent in AI applications. This paper presents AI-VOICE (Values-Oriented Implementation and Context Evaluation), a novel method to collect patient values, or utilities, of the downstream consequences stemming from an AI models use to guide care. The results are then used to select the models risk threshold, offering a mechanism by which an algorithm can concretely reflect patient values. MethodsThe entity being evaluated by AI-VOICE is an AI-informed workflow, which is composed of the patients health state, an action triggered by the AI model, and the benefits and harms accrued as a consequence of that action. The utilities of these workflows are measured through a survey-based, standard gamble experiment. These utilities define a patient-specific ratio of the cost of an inaccurate prediction versus the benefits of an accurate one. This ratio is mapped to the receiver-operator-characteristic curve to identify the risk threshold that reflects the patients values. The survey instrument is made freely available to researchers through a web-based application. ResultsA demonstration of AI-VOICE is provided using a hypothetical sepsis prediction algorithm. ConclusionAI-VOICE offers an accessible, quantitative method to incorporate patient values into AI-informed healthcare workflows.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Empowering Personalized Pharmacogenomics with Generative AI Solutions 95%
- Usability of a Machine-Learning Clinical Order Recommender System Interface for Clinical Decision Support and Physician Workflow 94%
- Learning Decision Thresholds for Risk-Stratification Models from Aggregate Clinician Behavior 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Signal from the Noise: A Mixed Methods Process Mining Approach to Evaluate Care Pathways. 95%
- Demonstrating the Consequences of Learning Missingness Patterns in Early Warning Systems for Preventative Health Care: A Novel Simulation and Solution 94%
- A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 94%
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 93%
- An Interpretable Risk Prediction Model for Healthcare with Pattern Attention 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.