Clinical stratification of Major Depressive Disorder in the UK Biobank: A gene-environment-brain Topological Data Analysis
Tassi, E.; Pigoni, A.; Turtulici, N.; Colombo, F.; Fortaner-Uya, L.; Bianchi, A. M.; Benedetti, F.; Fabbri, C.; Vai, B.; Brambilla, P.; Maggioni, E.
Show abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, affecting over 300 million people and posing a significant burden on healthcare systems. MDD is highly heterogeneous, with variations in symptoms, treatment response, and comorbidities that could be determined by diverse etiologic mechanisms, including genetic and neural substrates, and societal factors. Characterizing MDD subtypes with distinct clinical manifestations could improve patient care through targeted personalized interventions. Recently, Topological Data Analysis (TDA) has emerged as a promising tool for identifying homogeneous subgroups of diverse medical conditions and key disease markers, reducing complex data into comprehensible representations and capturing essential dataset features. Our study applied TDA to data from the UK Biobank MDD subcohort composed of 3052 samples, leveraging genetic, environmental, and neuroimaging data to stratify MDD into clinically meaningful subtypes. TDA graphs were built from unimodal and multimodal feature sets and quantitatively compared based on their capability to predict depression severity, physical comorbidities, and treatment response outcomes. Our findings showed a key role of the environment in determining the severity of depressive symptoms. Comorbid medical conditions of MDD were best predicted by brain imaging characteristics, while brain functional patterns resulted the best predictors of treatment response profiles. Our results suggest that considering genetic, environmental, and brain characteristics is essential to characterize the heterogeneity of MDD, providing avenues for the definition of robust markers of health outcomes in MDD.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying Machine-Learning and Deep-Learning to Predict Depression from Brain MRI and Identify Depression-Related Brain Biology 96%
- Potential Neurocognitive Biomarkers for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Severity in Recent Trauma Survivors 95%
- Whole-brain Mechanism of Neurofeedback Therapy: Predictive Modeling of Neurofeedback Outcomes on Repetitive Negative Thinking in Depression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estradiol Modulates Resting-State Connectivity in Perimenopausal Depression 95%
- Individual Deviations from Normative Electroencephalographic Connectivity Predict Antidepressant Response 94%
- Electroconvulsive therapy effects on anhedonia and reward circuitry anatomy: a dimensional structural neuroimaging approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Response to Neurofeedback in Major Depression Relates to Subtypes of Whole-Brain Activation Patterns During Training 95%
- Peripheral inflammation is associated with micro-structural and functional connectivity changes in depression-related brain networks 94%
- MRI-derived estimation of biological aging in patients with affective disorders in a 9-year follow-up - a prospective marker of future recurrence 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A generalizable functional connectivity signature characterizes brain dysfunction and links to rTMS treatment response in cocaine use disorder 94%
- Energy inefficiency underpinning brain state dysregulation in individuals with major depressive disorder 93%
- Neuroimaging Insights into Brain Mechanisms of Early-onset Restrictive Eating Disorders 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.