SMoRe GloS: An efficient and flexible framework for inferring global sensitivity of agent-based model parameters
Bergman, D. R.; Jackson, T. L.; Jain, H. V.; Norton, K.-A.
Show abstract
Agent-based models (ABMs) have become essential tools for simulating complex biological, ecological, and social systems where emergent behaviors arise from the interactions among individual agents. Quantifying uncertainty through global sensitivity analysis is crucial for assessing the robustness and reliability of ABM predictions. However, most global sensitivity methods demand substantial computational resources, making them impractical for highly complex models. Here, we introduce SMoRe GloS (Surrogate Modeling for Recapitulating Global Sensitivity), a novel, computationally efficient method for performing global sensitivity analysis of ABMs. By leveraging explicitly formulated surrogate models, SMoRe GloS allows for comprehensive parameter space exploration and uncertainty quantification without sacrificing accuracy. We demonstrate our methods flexibility by applying it to two biological ABMs: a simple 2D cell proliferation assay and a complex 3D vascular tumor growth model. Our results show that SMoRe GloS is compatible with simpler methods like the Morris one-at-a-time method, and more computationally intensive variance-based methods like eFAST. SMoRe GloS accurately recovered global sensitivity indices in each case while achieving substantial speedups, completing analyses in minutes. In contrast, direct implementation of eFAST amounted to several days of CPU time for the complex ABM. Remarkably, our method also estimates sensitivities for ABM parameters representing processes not explicitly included in the surrogate model, further enhancing its utility. By making global sensitivity analysis feasible for computationally expensive models, SMoRe GloS opens up new opportunities for uncertainty quantification in complex systems, allowing for more in depth exploration of model behavior, thereby increasing confidence in model predictions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- PEtab.jl: Advancing the Efficiency and Utility of Dynamic Modelling 96%
- Quasi-Entropy Closure: A Fast and Reliable Approach to Close the Moment Equations of the Chemical Master Equation 95%
- IsoMaTrix: a framework to visualize the isoclines of matrix games and quantify uncertainty in structured populations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficient inference for agent-based models of real-world phenomena 95%
- CrossLabFit: A Novel Framework for Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data Across Multiple Labs for Model Calibration 94%
- Efficient computation of adjoint sensitivities at steady-state in ODE models of biochemical reaction networks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.