Back

A Minimal PBPK Model Describes the Differential Disposition of Silica Nanoparticles In Vivo

Parrot, M. M.; Cave, J.; Pelaez, M.; Ghandehari, H.; Dogra, P.; Yellepeddi, V. K.

2024-09-19 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2024.09.18.24313941 medRxiv
Show abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as promising candidates for drug delivery due to their tunable physical and chemical properties. Among these, silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) are particularly valued for their biocompatibility and adaptability in applications like drug delivery and medical imaging. However, predicting SiNP biodistribution and clearance remains a significant challenge. To address this, we developed a minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) model to simulate the systemic disposition of SiNPs, calibrated using in vivo PK data from mice. The model assesses how variations in surface charge, size, porosity, and geometry influence SiNP biodistribution across key organs, including the kidneys, lungs, liver, and spleen. A global sensitivity analysis identified the most influential parameters, with the unbound fraction and elimination rate constants for the kidneys and MPS emerging as critical determinants of SiNP clearance. Non-compartmental analysis (NCA) further revealed that aminated SiNPs exhibit high accumulation in the liver, spleen, and kidneys, while mesoporous SiNPs primarily accumulate in the lungs. Rod-shaped SiNPs showed faster clearance compared to spherical NPs. The mPBPK model was extrapolated to predict SiNP behavior in humans, yielding strong predictive accuracy with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.98 for mice and 0.92 for humans. This model provides a robust framework for predicting the pharmacokinetics of diverse SiNPs, offering valuable insights for optimizing NP-based drug delivery systems and guiding the translation of these therapies from preclinical models to human applications.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
56.1%
50% of probability mass above
2
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
3
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
5
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
6
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
7
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
11
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
12
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
13
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
14
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
15
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
18
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
22
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
23
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.5%