Back

A Minimal PBPK Model Describes the Differential Disposition of Silica Nanoparticles In Vivo

Parrot, M. M.; Cave, J.; Pelaez, M.; Ghandehari, H.; Dogra, P.; Yellepeddi, V. K.

2024-09-19 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2024.09.18.24313941 medRxiv
Show abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as promising candidates for drug delivery due to their tunable physical and chemical properties. Among these, silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) are particularly valued for their biocompatibility and adaptability in applications like drug delivery and medical imaging. However, predicting SiNP biodistribution and clearance remains a significant challenge. To address this, we developed a minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) model to simulate the systemic disposition of SiNPs, calibrated using in vivo PK data from mice. The model assesses how variations in surface charge, size, porosity, and geometry influence SiNP biodistribution across key organs, including the kidneys, lungs, liver, and spleen. A global sensitivity analysis identified the most influential parameters, with the unbound fraction and elimination rate constants for the kidneys and MPS emerging as critical determinants of SiNP clearance. Non-compartmental analysis (NCA) further revealed that aminated SiNPs exhibit high accumulation in the liver, spleen, and kidneys, while mesoporous SiNPs primarily accumulate in the lungs. Rod-shaped SiNPs showed faster clearance compared to spherical NPs. The mPBPK model was extrapolated to predict SiNP behavior in humans, yielding strong predictive accuracy with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.98 for mice and 0.92 for humans. This model provides a robust framework for predicting the pharmacokinetics of diverse SiNPs, offering valuable insights for optimizing NP-based drug delivery systems and guiding the translation of these therapies from preclinical models to human applications.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.