From the Ground Up: Stakeholder Perspectives on Housing Interventions to Reduce Environmentally Mediated Infections
Acklin, M.; Graham, J. P.; Benjamin-Chung, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundHousing conditions are intrinsically linked to human health, with inadequate housing potentially increasing exposure to environmentally mediated pathogens. Housing interventions that aim to improve housing and reduce environmentally mediated infections, such as finished floors and housing upgrades for vector-borne diseases, remain relatively under-explored as health interventions. This study explored facilitators of and barriers to funding, implementing, and scaling up housing improvements as health interventions to reduce environmentally mediated infectious diseases. MethodsSixteen key informants (KIs) with direct experience in implementing or working within housing interventions and environmentally mediated infectious diseases in low- and middle-income countries were interviewed using a semi-structured interview format. KIs had diverse backgrounds, including academics researching housing interventions, housing policy advisors, and practitioners implementing housing interventions. A thematic analysis approach was used to identify key themes in interview transcripts, highlighting patterns, commonalities, and variations in participants responses. ResultsKIs emphasized the multi-dimensional impacts of housing interventions that are intrinsically linked to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including physical and mental health, as well as environmental, social, and economic dimensions. Moreover, a pronounced shortage of funding and financial systems to address housing interventions was highlighted, alongside the urgent need for more rigorous evidence and cost-benefit analyses. Furthermore, the imperative to raise awareness of the significance of housing and the critical importance of strong collaboration across sectors and stakeholders were stressed. Emphasizing the necessity for project-based and context-specific housing policies, the interviews revealed that contextualizing interventions to their specific setting and fostering community involvement are essential for successful implementation and scale-up. ConclusionsHousing interventions play a pivotal role in mitigating environmentally mediated diseases. These interventions can complement existing strategies like water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions, ensuring comprehensive approaches to healthy housing and sustainable development goals amidst climate change.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 96%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 94%
- Caregivers’ perception of risk for malaria, helminth infection and malaria-helminth co-infection among children living in urban and rural settings of Senegal: a qualitative study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- By the numbers and in their own words: A mixed methods study of unmet needs and humanitarian inclusion of older Syrian refugees in Lebanon 96%
- Intentional and unintentional non-adherence to social distancing measures during COVID-19: A mixed-methods analysis 95%
- Developing a context-relevant psychosocial stimulation intervention to promote cognitive development of children with severe acute malnutrition in Mwanza, Tanzania 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on pre-school children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study 93%
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 96%
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 93%
- Feasibility and acceptability of daily testing at school as an alternative to self-isolation following close contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19: A qualitative analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Co-production of informal settlement health: A community based participatory research program for building healthy communities in urban informal settlements of Salvador, Brazil. 93%
- Cross-sector Decision Landscape in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of North Carolina Decision-Makers 93%
- Agility and sustainability: A qualitative evaluation of COVID-19 Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) in the UK logistics sector 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.