Back

Subcallosal Cingulate structural connectivity as a biomarker for chronic low back pain

Tsolaki, E.; Wei, W.; Ward, M.; Bari, A.; Pouratian, N.

2024-09-18 pain medicine
10.1101/2024.09.17.24313765 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChronic low back pain (CLBP) poses a significant challenge, contributing significantly to the ongoing opioid crisis while also being a leading cause of disability. Although spinal cord stimulation (SCS) stands as the primary FDA-endorsed method for neuromodulatory therapy in CLBP, there remains a subset of patients unresponsive to SCS and others who experience insufficient pain relief over time. In view of the evidence suggesting the critical role of subcallosal cingulate cortex (SCC) connectivity in pain processing, in the current study we investigated the role of the baseline SCC structural as a potential neuroimaging predictive biomarker to identify patients that are likely to benefit from SCS. MethodsDiffusion magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired in 8 patients with CLBP (mean (SD) age = 70 (10) years; 6 female/2 male, 6 UCLA site, 2 UTSW) before their initial SCS trial. Probabilistic tractography from subject-specific anatomically defined SCC seed regions to the ventral striatum (VS), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), uncinate fasciculus (UCF) and bilateral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was used to calculate FSL structural probabilistic connectivity in the target network. To explore cross-sectional variations in SCC connectivity related to SCS trial response, we employed a general linear model (GLM) using the SCC probability of connectivity as dependent variable, and the response to the SCS trial as independent variable. We used Pearson correlation to evaluate further the relationships between the critical SCC probability of connectivity and the change in VAS score after the SCS trial. Finally, the role of depression in the treatment outcome was evaluated. ResultsResponders to SCS had significantly lower ipsilateral SCC connectivity to mPFC (F1,8 =8.19, p = 0.03) and VS (F1,8 =17.48, p=0.01) on the left hemisphere compared to non-responders. Pearson correlation analysis showed that decreased ipsilateral SCC baseline connectivity to left mPFC (p=0.03) and VS (p=0.01) was correlated with higher improvement in VAS scores. The baseline depression severity did not significantly influence the change in VAS score following the SCS trial. On the other hand, baseline SCC-VS connectivity on the left hemisphere was a significant predictor of change in VAS score (p=0.02). ConclusionsOur study highlights the important role of SCC connectivity that can serve as a potential biomarker for CLBP stratification and prediction to SCS treatment. These results can reshape our perspective on CLBP management and can serve as early indicator of response to the treatment providing a personalized approach based on the individuals underlying SCC connectivity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
2
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.4%
3
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.2%
4
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
5
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
8
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
10
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
17
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
23
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%