Health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: A systematic review
Caut, C.; Schoenaker, D.; McIntyre, E.; Steel, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundHealth professionals have previously identified various barriers and factors that would help facilitate preconception care services in healthcare settings. Clinically relevant preconception information and clinical practice guidelines have since been developed to aid health professionals in preconception care delivery. This systematic review aimed to 1) synthesise recent literature (past 8 years) describing health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care services or programmes and 2) determine if the experience of health professionals providing preconception care has changed compared to literature reviews conducted more than 8 years ago. MethodsFive databases were searched between 27/01/2016 and 20/11/2024. Primary quantitative and qualitative research studies were included if they examined health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards delivering preconception care services or programmes. Study quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist (qualitative studies) and AXIS tool (quantitative studies). Data synthesis used thematic categorisation adapted from the framework approach. ResultsTwenty-seven studies were included (n=11 qualitative, n=14 quantitative, n=2 mixed-methods studies). Methodological quality was generally good for qualitative studies but varied for quantitative studies. The results covered three categories: 1) addressing preconception care health literacy (i.e. lack of knowledge, awareness, training and resources), 2) clinical practicalities of preconception car e (i.e. need for coordination of care and clarity on role responsibility), and 3) the role of the patient (i.e. need for public health education to support patient-led conversations). ConclusionsLittle has changed regarding the barriers and facilitators to providing preconception care reported by health professionals. To improve the provision of preconception care, there is a need to co-develop professional and public preconception health education, clinical resources, and a coordinated preconception healthcare service model.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 96%
- Acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe 95%
- Facilitators and barriers to contraception access and use for Hispanic American adolescent women: An integrative literature review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 94%
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 94%
- The Menstrual Practice Needs Scale Short Form (MPNS-SF) and Rapid (MPNS-R): Development in Khulna, Bangladesh, and validation in cross-sectional surveys from Bangladesh and Uganda 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Revisiting the use and effectiveness of patient-held records in rural Malawi 94%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Assessing Language Difficulties in Health Facilities in Malawi 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 97%
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 95%
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.