Back

Access to Allogeneic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Search Prognosis: An Interventional Trial

Dehn, J.; Logan, B.; Shaw, B. E.; Devine, S.; Ciurea, S. O.; Horowitz, M.; He, N.; Pusic, I.; Srour, S. A.; Arai, S.; Juckett, M.; Uberti, J.; Hill, L.; Vasu, S.; Hogan, W. J.; Hayes-Lattin, B.; Westervelt, P.; Bashey, A.; Farhadfar, N.; Grunwald, M. R.; Leifer, E.; Symons, H.; Saad, A.; Vogel, J.; Erickson, C.; Buck, K.; Lee, S. J.; Pidala, J.

2024-09-16 transplantation
10.1101/2024.09.16.24313494 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportancePatients requiring allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation have variable likelihoods of identifying an 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor. A Search Prognosis calculator can estimate the likelihood. ObjectiveTo determine if using a search algorithm based on donor search prognosis can result in similar incidence of transplant between patients Very Likely (>90%) vs Very Unlikely (<10%) to have a matched unrelated donor. DesignThis interventional trial utilized a Search Prognosis-based biologic assignment algorithm to guide donor selection. Trial enrollment from June 13, 2019-May 13, 2022; analysis of data as of September 7, 2023 with median follow-up post-evaluability of 14.5 months. SettingsNational multi-center Blood and Marrow Transplantation Clinical Trials Network 1702 study of US participating transplant centers. ParticipantsAcute myeloid and lymphoid leukemias, myelodysplastic syndrome, Hodgkins and non-Hodgkins lymphomas, severe aplastic anemia, and sickle cell disease patients referred to participating transplant centers were invited to participate. 2225 patients were enrolled and 1751 were declared evaluable for this study. Patients were declared evaluable once it was determined no suitable HLA-matched related donor was available. InterventionPatients assigned to the Very Likely arm were to proceed with matched unrelated donor, while Very Unlikely were to utilize alternative donors. A third stratum, Less Likely ([~]25%) to find a matched unrelated donor, were observed under standard center practices, but were not part of the primary objective. Main OutcomeCumulative incidence of transplantation by Search Prognosis arm ResultsEvaluable patients included 1751 of which 413 (24%) were from racial/ethnic minorities. Search prognosis was 958 (55%) Very Likely, 517 (30%) Less Likely and 276 (16%) Very Unlikely. 1171 (67%) received HCT, 384 (22%) died without HCT, and 196 (11%) remained alive without HCT. Among the 1,234 patients, the adjusted cumulative incidence (95% CI) of HCT at 6-months was 59.8% (56.7-62.8) in the Very Likely group versus 52.3% (46.1-58.5) in the Very Unlikely (P=0.113). ConclusionsA prospective Search Prognosis-based algorithm can be effectively implemented in a national multicenter clinical trial. This approach resulted in rapid alternative donor identification and comparable rates of HCT in patients Very Likely and Very Unlikely to find a matched unrelated donor. Trial Registration: NCT#03904134

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
6
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
8
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
10
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
13
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Kidney International Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%