High Throughput Meta-analysis of Antimicrobial Peptides for Characterizing Class Specific Therapeutic Candidates: An in-silico Approach
Agrawal, P.; Pandey, A.; Rajesh Lenin, R.; Patiyal, S.
Show abstract
The increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is becoming a serious concern worldwide and requires newer drugs. Recent evidence has shown growing interest in developing peptide-based therapeutics to tackle AMR. In the current study, we performed a meta-analysis of nearly 8.6 million predicted antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and assessed their antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal activity. We created high-quality, class-specific datasets and performed several analyses, including amino acid composition, motif preference, physiochemical properties, etc. We observed significant differences in the residue composition, charge, molecular weight, pI value, and instability index of peptides among 3 AMP classes. We further developed multiple machine learning models to predict peptide activity using the dataset. Our Extratree model developed using composition-based features achieved the highest AUROC of 0.98 for antibacterial peptide (ABP), 0.99 for antiviral peptide (AVP), and 0.99 for antifungal peptide (AFP) prediction when tested on an independent dataset. Subsequent filtering of peptides based on moonlighting properties (toxicity, allergenicity, cell-penetrating ability, half-life, and secondary structure) yielded a list of peptides that exhibit substantial therapeutic potential. We further selected the top 10 peptides in each category based on their half-lives, predicted their 3D structures using ColabFold, a feature built into ChimeraX1.8 software, and used HDock to perform molecular docking analysis with a pathogenic protein selected from an organism in each class. Docking studies demonstrated strong interaction between peptides and proteins, and based on free energy, we ranked the peptides. Overall, we have put forth class-specific peptides with high therapeutic potential based on rigorous meta-analysis encompassing [~]8.6 million AMPs.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploration of DPP-IV inhibitory peptide design rules assisted by deep learning pipeline that identifies restriction enzyme cutting site 95%
- Designing BH3-mimetic Peptide Inhibitors for the Viral Bcl-2 Homologs A179L and BHRF1: Importance of long-range electrostatic interactions 94%
- Utilizing Heteroatom Types and Numbers from Extensive Ligand Libraries to Develop Novel hERG Blocker QSAR Models Using Machine Learning-based Classifiers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phage libraries screening on P53: yield improvement by zinc and a new parasites integrating analysis and rationale 95%
- Design of multi-epitope vaccine candidate against Brucella type IV secretion system (T4SS) 95%
- Inhibiting the copper efflux system in microbes as a novel approach for developing antibiotics 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pred-AHCP: Robust feature selection enabled Sequence Specific Prediction of Anti-Hepatitis C Peptides via Machine Learning 97%
- WITHDRAWN: The Use of DeepQSAR Models for The Discovery of Peptides with Enhanced Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Potential. 96%
- Predicting Antimicrobial Activity for Untested Peptide-Based Drugs Using Collaborative Filtering and Link Prediction 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.